MRNA Vaccines increase risk of acute coronary syndrome

[SanDiego619]

Yes it is. I've been working pretty hard to quantify the risks. I wouldn't bother if they were negligible, now would I?

They still seem to be quite manageable, but we will know for sure at the end of the week, with the next VAERS drop.

You can't really do anything to manage heart damage or other jab problems. Once you inject that stuff, what's done is done. It's a roll of the dice. Too many unknowns for me.

[as_rocketman]

You can't really do anything to manage heart damage or other jab problems. Once you inject that stuff, what's done is done. It's a roll of the dice. Too many unknowns for me.

I see no reason to even think this might be true.

[bigbossman]

They still seem to be quite manageable, but we will know for sure at the end of the week, with the next VAERS drop.

Myocardia is not manageable. Once the damage is done, it is done. Ask a cardiologist.

[as_rocketman]

Myocardia is not manageable. Once the damage is done, it is done. Ask a cardiologist.

Utter nonsense. The entire field of cardiology exists because there are meaningful treatments available for this and similar illnesses.

[ibanezfoo]

Yes it is. I've been working pretty hard to quantify the risks. I wouldn't bother if they were negligible, now would I?

They still seem to be quite manageable, but we will know for sure at the end of the week, with the next VAERS drop.

You did see the Pfizer document release right? And thats just the first one....

[bigbossman]

Utter nonsense. The entire field of cardiology exists because there are meaningful treatments available for this and similar illnesses.

So, there is a way to regenerate dead heart tissue? Please - do tell.

[bigbossman]

You did see the Pfizer document release right? And thats just the first one....

But but but...... that's not evidence!!!

[as_rocketman]

You did see the Pfizer document release right? And thats just the first one....

You'll have to explain what bearing you think this has on what I said. I don't see it.

So, there is a way to regenerate dead heart tissue? Please - do tell.

You should probably familiarize yourself better with actual monitoring, management, and treatment. To quote you, "ask a cardiologist."

[Wherryj]

Back in college, I was taught that you wanted your "worst enemy" to question your data since a failure to do so would provide support for your work. And, I also see similarities between the "research" done on these vaccines and the "research" done on climate change. Debate is nearly criminalized when it comes to these "vaccines." Why the "pro-vaxers" on here don't find that concerning I just can't explain.

We deserve the right to know how safe these shots are and the only way to know that is by allowing full disclosure and debate.

In a similar vein, Einstein was challenged for his theory on relativity. 100 top scientists wrote a letter rebuking him. Einstein's retort was essentially: Why 100? If I was wrong one alone would be sufficient.

The number of people who agree has nothing to do with the validity of a theory. Most paradigm changes have occurred when a small group (often only one individual) questions the status quo and ends up being proven to be the only one who is right.

[Wherryj]

Utter nonsense. The entire field of cardiology exists because there are meaningful treatments available for this and similar illnesses.

Actually, you are both technically correct. Once the damage from myocarditis is done, you cannot repair it and neither can the body. TECHNICALLY you can "manage" the condition-via anti-arrhythmia attempts such as AICD, although that isn't a 100% guarantee.

I wouldn't quite put this into the "utter nonsense" category unless I was fact checking as "Snopes".

Trust me, I do this for a living and I have asked several electrophysiologists and quite a few cardiologists-they are all very concerned. Two of them sublease from my practice. I can assure you that they are both "very concerned" about this situation.

[bigbossman]

You should probably familiarize yourself better with actual monitoring, management, and treatment. To quote you, "ask a cardiologist."

Sure, you go ahead and regenerate dead heart muscle. "Utter nonsense", indeed. What is "utter nonsense", is taking a course of action that might well give you this condition - FOR NO COMPELLING REASON - because you can "manage" it on the backside. That is the reasoning of a foolish, deranged, or downright stupid person.

[SPUTTER]

[stix213]

1 in 2680 young males get clinical heart issues from Comirnaty in Hong Kong.

https://rwmalonemd.substack.com/p/1-in-2680-young-men-develop-acute?r=ta0o1

Among male adolescents, the incidence after the first and second doses were 5.57 (95% CI 2.38-12.53) and 37.32 (95% CI 26.98-51.25) per 100,000 persons vaccinated.

[Deadon]

1 in 2680 young males get clinical heart issues from Comirnaty in Hong Kong.

https://rwmalonemd.substack.com/p/1-...-acute?r=ta0o1

Well this should get interesting. I'm sure they don't know what they're talking about.

[ibanezfoo]

Actually, you are both technically correct. Once the damage from myocarditis is done, you cannot repair it and neither can the body. TECHNICALLY you can "manage" the condition-via anti-arrhythmia attempts such as AICD, although that isn't a 100% guarantee.

I wouldn't quite put this into the "utter nonsense" category unless I was fact checking as "Snopes".

Trust me, I do this for a living and I have asked several electrophysiologists and quite a few cardiologists-they are all very concerned. Two of them sublease from my practice. I can assure you that they are both "very concerned" about this situation.

I genuinely appreciate you sharing your knowledge and experience in this forum.