Wouldn't you rather hang out with the unvaccinated?

[larkja]

The drug companies and the weasel have admitted the vaccine does not protect against contracting or transmitting. It was designed to lessen the effects which means fewer deaths.

So, a vaccinated individual who has COVID might have symptoms so mild, he might not even know he has it. We hear stories all the time of vaccinated, asymptomatic people walking among us. Many vaccinated are walking around with COVID and transmitting COVID and they have no idea it's happening. Which leads us to...the unvaccinated.

If the vaccine masks/lessons symptoms, then it would be safe to assume the unvaccinated will show more symptoms. And, they would be more likely to stay home and/or get treated. It would also be safe to assume that if an unvaccinated person has no symptoms, then it's a pretty good bet that person is not infected. Which leads me to my point.

Shouldn't we be more comfortable around an unvaccinated "healthy" person knowing they probably don't have COVID, vs a vaccinated "healthy" person that might be masking symptoms and transmitting and infecting those around him?

Goes back to Dr. Robert Malone and many others that advocated for the elderly and vulnerable to receive the vaccine, but the healthy and young don't need it. By vaccinating healthy children, they are creating a situation where these kids might get infected (and have no symptoms), they will spread to their classmates and teachers, then possibly bring home to elderly and compromised members of the family.

But it's the unvaccinated that are the risk

Would love to hear the trolls and Karens out there dispute this logic.

[turbolxstang]

If we want to make the workplace safer, require everyone to test weekly, never mind, forgot it's not about that

[stix213]

The drug companies and the weasel have admitted the vaccine does not protect against contracting or transmitting. It was designed to lessen the effects which means fewer deaths.

I just want to point out you're repeating a lie. They are only saying it was just designed to lessen the effects after it was found to do little to prevent transmission after the fact. Up until then, and what all vaccine mandates are based on, is that the vax lessens transmission.

[larkja]

I just want to point out you're repeating a lie. They are only saying it was just designed to lessen the effects after it was found to do little to prevent transmission after the fact. Up until then, and what all vaccine mandates are based on, is that the vax lessens transmission.

We're splitting hairs here. The original narrative was to lessen transmission and infection, then later morphed into the current narrative of lessening the effects. Either way, wouldn't the unvaccinated be a safer group since, using the left's logic, their symptoms would be more severe and easier to identify?

[stix213]

We're splitting hairs here. The original narrative was to lessen transmission and infection, then later morphed into the current narrative of lessening the effects. Either way, wouldn't the unvaccinated be a safer group since, using the left's logic, their symptoms would be more severe and easier to identify?

I wasn't disputing your conclusion, just the narrative that it was designed to only lessen disease.

[sacrvrrat]

[ibanezfoo]

As long as they keep their traps shut and dont talk about it like vegans and people who do crossfit I could care less. A couple of my friends got the vax. They never talk about it. I'm just not afraid of rona in any case.

[theLBC]

clotshotters are delta factories. i'd rather hangout with the amish.

[sbo80]

It's ironic to consider they pushed "if you get vaxxed you can remove the mask", when it may be that the vaxxed unmasked are the ones continuing to drive infection rates. I do realize that position implies that going back to masking for everyone will be more effective at reducing transmissions than the vax, and that's not a popular opinion around here*. But I think objectively it's more accurate than suggesting the "vaccine" will save us all as our glorious leaders like to tell us.
*For the record I don't support mandates of vax or masks.

[Deadon]

I'm sure you're all surprised but no I don't want to be around vaxxed people. I also don't want to be around gun owners that will surrender their guns when the government tells them to.

When people comply and become the majority it sets the tone that the rest of us must comply. In that case what do you stand for? You claim to have God given rights but won't defend them? Yeah no.

[RedPilled1]

I'm sure you're all surprised but no I don't want to be around vaxxed people. I also don't want to be around gun owners that will surrender their guns when the government tells them to.

When people comply and become the majority it sets the tone that the rest of us must comply. In that case what do you stand for? You claim to have God given rights but won't defend them? Yeah no.

[The Tiger]

I'd rather hand out with people that don't care, don't ask, don't talk about it.

[SPUTTER]

Doesn't matter to me but I consider the "vaccinated" as generally unintelligent and I've written them off. Basically walking dead to me

[Deadon]

I can see older people getting it. Because we still don't know the long term sides.

But like I said you're either for freedom of choice or you're not. You're either for your rights or you're not. I have a strong feeling Americans have become to lazy and like their little things more than freedom.
The issue is, the government now knows this and like I said your guys are next. You guys have no idea the doors you've opened.

I dont know how many of you watch the UFC but do you know how many American Champs there are now? There's a reason for that. Think about it, we've become soft.

[SPUTTER]

Unironically, the weak minded are weeding themselves out.
I can operate a front loader and a dozer so I'm prepared to work digging mass graves, 😆.