a lot of you seem to be misunderstanding. The only thing that has changed, is a court said "cease and desist until we hear the case", and OSHA said "ok we will wait". That's all. They didn't change their mind or reverse.
Unconfigured Ad Widget
Collapse
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OSHA suspends mandate
Collapse
X
-
-
-
Do not give in to evil, but proceed ever more boldly against it.Comment
-
Comment
-
I don't think so; I know of several HUGE corporations that announced yesterday or today they were ceasing the roll-out of any previously indicated mandates where most mirrored the OSHA regulations.
Their obvious concern is they would be proceeding against an injunction, like breaking a restraining order, which the regulating body itself (OSHA) is observing, and doing that may come with its own penalties and fines.
Add to this, should they go forth with creating their own rules even if based on what OSHA released, they would be putting themselves in serious jeopardy and potentially carry more serious repercussions in the way of discrimination, infringement, wrongful termination, hostile work environment, intimidation, coercion, among a laundry list of other employee lawsuits.
It would be on a scale of how back up until about 30 years ago, corporations often intimidating women in the work force that got pregnant to either get an abortion or be fired, from Fortune 500 to Fantasy Land Hollywood - it was a common thing swept under the rug (until ironically, a few big lawsuits from a few actresses to stop the practice.)
--------------------------------------------------
Originally posted by LibrarianWhat compelling interest has any level of government in knowing what guns are owned by civilians? (Those owned by government should be inventoried and tracked, for exactly the same reasons computers and desks and chairs are tracked: responsible care of public property.)
If some level of government had that information, what would they do with it? How would having that info benefit public safety? How would it benefit law enforcement?Comment
-
True, but it will inevitably push out the original January 4th kill date, because by their definitions of "fully pseudo-vaccinated" someone will have to get the first toxic injection at least some time on or before 12/7 for Moderna, or 12/14 for Pfizer in order to get the next toxic load prior to the January 4th deadline.
So if this this injunction and OSHA's delay on enforcement rolls into mid-December, every day thereafter is another day that the deadline must be pushed further into 2022 (and hopefully NEVER FOREVER for that matter.)
"The recommended interval between the first and second dose is 21 days for Pfizer-BioNTech and 28 days for Moderna".
--------------------------------------------------
Originally posted by LibrarianWhat compelling interest has any level of government in knowing what guns are owned by civilians? (Those owned by government should be inventoried and tracked, for exactly the same reasons computers and desks and chairs are tracked: responsible care of public property.)
If some level of government had that information, what would they do with it? How would having that info benefit public safety? How would it benefit law enforcement?Comment
-
I don't think so; I know of several HUGE corporations that announced yesterday or today they were ceasing the roll-out of any previously indicated mandates where most mirrored the OSHA regulations.
Their obvious concern is they would be proceeding against an injunction, like breaking a restraining order, which the regulating body itself (OSHA) is observing, and doing that may come with its own penalties and fines.
Add to this, should they go forth with creating their own rules even if based on what OSHA released, they would be putting themselves in serious jeopardy and potentially carry more serious repercussions in the way of discrimination, infringement, wrongful termination, hostile work environment, intimidation, coercion, among a laundry list of other employee lawsuits.
It would be on a scale of how back up until about 30 years ago, corporations often intimidating women in the work force that got pregnant to either get an abortion or be fired, from Fortune 500 to Fantasy Land Hollywood - it was a common thing swept under the rug (until ironically, a few big lawsuits from a few actresses to stop the practice.)
---Do not give in to evil, but proceed ever more boldly against it.Comment
-
OSHA has stopped but the Biden administration is persisting.
I wonder if this will impact school mandates? That is an issue for college and high school in my household. Any school that mandates vaccine is a no-go. We found a couple for colleges. High school may be an issue next year. IF so I am back to home school.Comment
-
Comment
-
You are probably right, but I disagree with why.This case almost certainly won’t, other cases might, though there is a steep hurdle in the way:
— Michael
Small pox had a 30% death rate. Covid has a death rate approaching zero for healthy children. The precedent does not apply.
AAAnd, you can opt out of other vaccinations for school. Those vaccines are for diseases that are far more dangerous to kids.
The schools tend to be staffed and managed by idiots. Same for the health departments. Logic and facts hold little sway with them.
Perhaps if we had Frito Bandejo represent us?
Comment
Calguns.net Statistics
Collapse
Topics: 1,862,159
Posts: 25,089,974
Members: 355,415
Active Members: 4,870
Welcome to our newest member, scentedtrunk.
What's Going On
Collapse
There are currently 5309 users online. 60 members and 5249 guests.
Most users ever online was 239,041 at 11:39 PM on 02-14-2026.

Comment