Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

OSHA suspends mandate

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • #16
    sbo80
    Senior Member
    • Apr 2014
    • 2264

    a lot of you seem to be misunderstanding. The only thing that has changed, is a court said "cease and desist until we hear the case", and OSHA said "ok we will wait". That's all. They didn't change their mind or reverse.

    Comment

    • #17
      RedPilled1
      Banned
      • Oct 2021
      • 50

      Originally posted by sbo80
      a lot of you seem to be misunderstanding. The only thing that has changed, is a court said "cease and desist until we hear the case", and OSHA said "ok we will wait". That's all. They didn't change their mind or reverse.

      Comment

      • #18
        deerdeerdeer
        Veteran Member
        • Sep 2014
        • 2696

        Originally posted by sbo80
        a lot of you seem to be misunderstanding. The only thing that has changed, is a court said "cease and desist until we hear the case", and OSHA said "ok we will wait". That's all. They didn't change their mind or reverse.
        Whoopsieee..

        Comment

        • #19
          steadyrock
          I need a LIFE!!
          • Aug 2007
          • 10235

          Originally posted by sbo80
          a lot of you seem to be misunderstanding. The only thing that has changed, is a court said "cease and desist until we hear the case", and OSHA said "ok we will wait". That's all. They didn't change their mind or reverse.
          Do not give in to evil, but proceed ever more boldly against it.

          Comment

          • #20
            RedPilled1
            Banned
            • Oct 2021
            • 50

            Comment

            • #21
              elSquid
              In Memoriam
              • Aug 2007
              • 11844

              Originally posted by Dravenguild
              The courts seem to have jumped on the private business mandate fairly quickly why has there not been this level of alacrity on the federal mandate?

              Comment

              • #22
                The Gleam
                I need a LIFE!!
                • Feb 2011
                • 12242

                I don't think so; I know of several HUGE corporations that announced yesterday or today they were ceasing the roll-out of any previously indicated mandates where most mirrored the OSHA regulations.

                Their obvious concern is they would be proceeding against an injunction, like breaking a restraining order, which the regulating body itself (OSHA) is observing, and doing that may come with its own penalties and fines.

                Add to this, should they go forth with creating their own rules even if based on what OSHA released, they would be putting themselves in serious jeopardy and potentially carry more serious repercussions in the way of discrimination, infringement, wrongful termination, hostile work environment, intimidation, coercion, among a laundry list of other employee lawsuits.

                It would be on a scale of how back up until about 30 years ago, corporations often intimidating women in the work force that got pregnant to either get an abortion or be fired, from Fortune 500 to Fantasy Land Hollywood - it was a common thing swept under the rug (until ironically, a few big lawsuits from a few actresses to stop the practice.)

                ---
                -----------------------------------------------
                Originally posted by Librarian
                What compelling interest has any level of government in knowing what guns are owned by civilians? (Those owned by government should be inventoried and tracked, for exactly the same reasons computers and desks and chairs are tracked: responsible care of public property.)

                If some level of government had that information, what would they do with it? How would having that info benefit public safety? How would it benefit law enforcement?

                Comment

                • #23
                  The Gleam
                  I need a LIFE!!
                  • Feb 2011
                  • 12242

                  Originally posted by sbo80
                  a lot of you seem to be misunderstanding. The only thing that has changed, is a court said "cease and desist until we hear the case", and OSHA said "ok we will wait". That's all. They didn't change their mind or reverse.
                  True, but it will inevitably push out the original January 4th kill date, because by their definitions of "fully pseudo-vaccinated" someone will have to get the first toxic injection at least some time on or before 12/7 for Moderna, or 12/14 for Pfizer in order to get the next toxic load prior to the January 4th deadline.

                  So if this this injunction and OSHA's delay on enforcement rolls into mid-December, every day thereafter is another day that the deadline must be pushed further into 2022 (and hopefully NEVER FOREVER for that matter.)

                  "The recommended interval between the first and second dose is 21 days for Pfizer-BioNTech and 28 days for Moderna".

                  ---
                  -----------------------------------------------
                  Originally posted by Librarian
                  What compelling interest has any level of government in knowing what guns are owned by civilians? (Those owned by government should be inventoried and tracked, for exactly the same reasons computers and desks and chairs are tracked: responsible care of public property.)

                  If some level of government had that information, what would they do with it? How would having that info benefit public safety? How would it benefit law enforcement?

                  Comment

                  • #24
                    steadyrock
                    I need a LIFE!!
                    • Aug 2007
                    • 10235

                    Originally posted by The Gleam
                    I don't think so; I know of several HUGE corporations that announced yesterday or today they were ceasing the roll-out of any previously indicated mandates where most mirrored the OSHA regulations.

                    Their obvious concern is they would be proceeding against an injunction, like breaking a restraining order, which the regulating body itself (OSHA) is observing, and doing that may come with its own penalties and fines.

                    Add to this, should they go forth with creating their own rules even if based on what OSHA released, they would be putting themselves in serious jeopardy and potentially carry more serious repercussions in the way of discrimination, infringement, wrongful termination, hostile work environment, intimidation, coercion, among a laundry list of other employee lawsuits.

                    It would be on a scale of how back up until about 30 years ago, corporations often intimidating women in the work force that got pregnant to either get an abortion or be fired, from Fortune 500 to Fantasy Land Hollywood - it was a common thing swept under the rug (until ironically, a few big lawsuits from a few actresses to stop the practice.)

                    ---
                    Do not give in to evil, but proceed ever more boldly against it.

                    Comment

                    • #25
                      SPUTTER
                      Calguns Addict
                      • Jun 2009
                      • 7504

                      Don't care about what Biden, Osha, or my employer says. NO!

                      Comment

                      • #26
                        stix213
                        AKA: Joe Censored
                        CGN Contributor - Lifetime
                        • Apr 2009
                        • 18998

                        Comment

                        • #27
                          Scota4570
                          Senior Member
                          • Sep 2006
                          • 1719

                          OSHA has stopped but the Biden administration is persisting.

                          I wonder if this will impact school mandates? That is an issue for college and high school in my household. Any school that mandates vaccine is a no-go. We found a couple for colleges. High school may be an issue next year. IF so I am back to home school.

                          Comment

                          • #28
                            elSquid
                            In Memoriam
                            • Aug 2007
                            • 11844

                            Originally posted by Scota4570

                            I wonder if this will impact school mandates?

                            Comment

                            • #29
                              Scota4570
                              Senior Member
                              • Sep 2006
                              • 1719

                              Originally posted by elSquid
                              This case almost certainly won’t, other cases might, though there is a steep hurdle in the way:



                              — Michael
                              You are probably right, but I disagree with why.

                              Small pox had a 30% death rate. Covid has a death rate approaching zero for healthy children. The precedent does not apply.

                              AAAnd, you can opt out of other vaccinations for school. Those vaccines are for diseases that are far more dangerous to kids.

                              The schools tend to be staffed and managed by idiots. Same for the health departments. Logic and facts hold little sway with them.

                              Perhaps if we had Frito Bandejo represent us?

                              Comment

                              • #30
                                Bukowski
                                Senior Member
                                • Mar 2008
                                • 810

                                Originally posted by CrazyCobraManTim
                                Doesn't seem to affect federal contractors is what I'm seeing. Just private companies without .GOV federal contracts. Then again - didn't DC circuit hold up mandate for .MIL a few weeks back?
                                sigpic

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                UA-8071174-1