FOIA: CDC Admits No Record of Unvaccinated Person Spreading COVID After Recovering

[ENTHUSIAST]

FOIA: CDC Admits No Record of Unvaccinated Person Spreading COVID After Recovering from COVID

Boom!

https://www.swfinstitute.org/news/89518/foia-cdc-admits-no-record-of-unvaccinated-person-spreading-covid-after-recovering-from-covid

[sbo80]

though I'll be a critical thinker and point out, that having no record of something doesn't mean what it seems to mean. They have very little records of who's spreading covid at all, because that isn't really tracked well. The response says as much - we don't have a record of something we didn't write down or keep track of. The US has largely rejected attempts at "contact tracing", and majority cases of covid, people have no clue where they caught it or from whom. So logically it follows that of course they have no record of something that isn't tracked.
Should they have tracked it, to learn more about this disease? Probably yes. Are they intentionally not keeping records because they won't like what it shows? Possibly. There's a lot of bad science going on.
I thought we do have records of people catching covid a second+ time, and it would follow that once reinfected, you again become contagious. (I have no links to back this up, just a memory, and I suppose it's possible these second positives are false, latent positive tests and not really "sick" people).