99.5% vaxxed

[LBDamned]

So ASR gets his data from Dilbert.

Makes sense now.

[Dan_Eastvale]

I wish they would do that now... Referencing the vax.

Would they have the huevos?

[bigbossman]

So ASR gets his data from Dilbert.

Makes sense now.

Lol.

[sigfan91]

this food pyramid is what gets people fat, grain should be the small portion and carbs should not be listed, fruit and grains are carbs. fruit should be the 2nd smallest.

The correct food pyramid.

[sd_shooter]

The correct food pyramid.

I think you're right!

An older pyramid, the 'foundation' is tons of starch:

[sd_shooter]

More lockdowns is the cure

https://thelibertydaily.com/ultra-vaxxed-ireland-imposes-curfews-lockdowns-while-still-pushing-even-more-to-get-the-jabs/

[Marauder2003]

That adds up to 130%. Without the water. So, we can over eat?

That point in bold is a huge issue. It's not politically correct to call out the obese. You're judging them!

Back in the day we used to be taught the food pyramid - eat healthy, live healthy. That has gone out the window.
(BTW I have no idea if this is the 'correct' pyramid... just a random web pic)

[sbo80]

On topic - the "% vax" numbers are now completely irrelevant. Since the CDC says it "wears off" after just months. But all those % numbers are "since the beginning" which is now nearly a year ago. There are lots and lots of people counted in the "% vax" category, that are basically unvaxxed again. From a statistical point of view, it is not a useful metric for anything. Those high numbers are being used as a psychological weapon of peer pressure, basically "everyone else is doing it" argument. If they were admitting that due to people not getting boosters, the effective % vaxxed right now is closer to 40%, that's bad for the narrative.

[sigfan91]

On topic - the "% vax" numbers are now completely irrelevant. Since the CDC says it "wears off" after just months. But all those % numbers are "since the beginning" which is now nearly a year ago. There are lots and lots of people counted in the "% vax" category, that are basically unvaxxed again. From a statistical point of view, it is not a useful metric for anything. Those high numbers are being used as a psychological weapon of peer pressure, basically "everyone else is doing it" argument. If they were admitting that due to people not getting boosters, the effective % vaxxed right now is closer to 40%, that's bad for the narrative.

"They" might eventually change the term from "fully vaxxed" to "currently vaxxed" as in those who have had a booster within the past 6/3/1 month.

[Squatch]

Vax the dead when they come to vote!

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk

[sbo80]

"They" might eventually change the term from "fully vaxxed" to "currently vaxxed" as in those who have had a booster within the past 6/3/1 month.

Probably. But in the near term it will be counter-productive to them I think, if they suddenly dropped the reporting from "we're at 75% and climbing!" back to "well now it's only 35% currently vaxxed". That's bad optics. And most everything that's happening right now is about optics, not about solutions.

[sd_shooter]

"They" might eventually change the term from "fully vaxxed" to "currently vaxxed" as in those who have had a booster within the past 6/3/1 month.

They'll also change the definition of "booster." In the beginning it was the 2nd of a 2-shot dose.... hereafter it will be a required 6-month vaccine (else your passport becomes invalid - no work or travel.)

[sigfan91]

reminds me of that old movie "Night of the Fully Vaxxed"

Was that by the same guy who made "Return of the Fully Vaxxed" and "Dawn of the Vaxxed?"

[stonefly-2]

Was that by the same guy who made "Return of the Fully Vaxxed" and "Dawn of the Vaxxed?"

That and Motel Vax.

Meat's meat and the vaxxed need to keep on vaxxing.