Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

Oroville City Council Votes for "Constitutional Republic City" Status Over Mandates

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • TrappedinCalifornia
    Calguns Addict
    • Jan 2018
    • 9021

    Oroville City Council Votes for "Constitutional Republic City" Status Over Mandates

    Since this seems to be mostly about COVID mandates, for now, I'm putting this in the COVID section...

    A California city council voted to make itself a 'Constitutional Republic City' to skirt state and federal orders it doesn't want to enforce

    A city council in California voted 6-1 in favor of designating the city a "Constitutional Republic City" in an attempt to skirt state or federal orders it doesn't want to enforce.

    The move follows more than a year of state and federal mandates concerning the COVID-19 pandemic, though city officials said the resolution was not tied to any particular mandate or effort by California Gov. Gavin Newsom or by President Joe Biden...

    "It's just basically drawing the line," Thompson said, according to the report. "It's not necessarily against one specific mandate, we're not talking about one mandate that's been pushing on us recently it's a barrage of mandates."...

    Thompson previously told ABC 7 in an email: "this has to do with the large amount of mandates that are affecting every aspect of our lives and our kids' lives. The American culture and way of life is being challenged at its very core and perverted by radicalized politicians who have forgotten that, as a republic, the power belongs to the people." ...
    At the link in the quote, you find... Oroville City Council will discuss a resolution that could possibly bypass state mandates

    The Northstate, like much of the country, is divided over COVID-19 protocols and vaccine mandates.

    The City of Oroville is considering rejecting state control and executive orders. At the request of Vice Mayor Scott Thomson, Oroville City Council will discuss during Tuesday's meeting declaring the city a constitutional republic, a move he believes will allow them to bypass state mandates...

    As the resolution is currently written, "any executive orders issued by the State of California or by the United States federal government that are overreaching or clearly violate our constitutionally protected rights will not be enforced by the City of Oroville against its citizens executive orders issued by the state or by the federal government the council believes are overreaching or clearly violate constitutionally protected rights, will not be enforced by the City of Oroville."

    In an email exchange with Vice Mayor Thomson, he said, "this has to do with the large amount of mandates that are affecting every aspect of our lives and our kids' lives. The American culture and way of life is being challenged at its very core and perverted by radicalized politicians who have forgotten that, as a republic, the power belongs to the people. Our founders understood the dangers of those who would like to have more control over the people, and thus they set up our country with a firm foundation that separated the powers, by forming a Republic, and protected our God-given rights, in the founding documents in the US Constitution. America is already a Constitutional Republic, however, I put this declaration out for the agenda as a reminder and a statement that we the people in Oroville are not amicable to the tyranny of power-hungry politicians."...
    At the end of the first piece...

    ...Councilmember Art Hartley, who voted in favor of the resolution, called it a "political statement" that had "absolutely no teeth," according to ABC 7.

    UC Davis Law Professor Lisa Pruitt told CBS 13 the resolution likely had no legal basis.

    "My sense is the strong presumption would be that the city of Oroville does not have the power to do this," she told the outlet. " I see this primarily as a gesture."
    Such has always been my understanding of these 'sanctuary' movements; i.e., that they are more political statements than actual, enforceable laws. But, in this context (and others), we could use a few more statements like this.

    Anyone from Oroville or that area with more, first-hand insight?
  • #2
    TrappedinCalifornia
    Calguns Addict
    • Jan 2018
    • 9021

    It hit FOX News this morning and though they are a day (or 10 days) late, they do have a bit more detail in that, in many respects, the piece is an aggregation of other reports...

    California 'sanctuary city' declares itself a Constitutional Republic to fight COVID mandates

    ..."In a way, we are acting as a sanctuary city for our citizens and their rights and freedoms protected by the U.S. and state constitutions," he added. "Gavin Newsom modeled this type of declaration for us when he declared San Francisco a sanctuary city for what he believed to be overreach by the federal government against his citizens." ...

    "Each and every mandate will be handled differently. Although we realize this virus is serious; we also believe that protecting the constitutional freedoms our citizens have is also something we take seriously. Our state representatives have been trying to get through to our governor for him to hear that just because something works well for big cities like Sacramento or San Francisco does not mean that the same thing holds true for rural areas like Oroville," Thompson said. Oroville is located in Northern California, about 70 miles north of Sacramento.

    "If he would allow more local control or listen to our representatives, we would not be here," he added in his comments to Fox News.

    The resolution can be modified at any time, which will not put it at risk of losing funding, according to City Attorney Scott Huber...

    Comment

    Working...
    UA-8071174-1