Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

MSN turns on Fauci

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Scota4570
    Senior Member
    • Sep 2006
    • 1719

    MSN turns on Fauci

    I am surprised to see this on the MSN. It might indicate the DNC is scared.

  • #2
    wpage
    Calguns Addict
    • Jan 2011
    • 6071

    Run DNC...

    The Dems are on the run for mid term loss.
    God so loved the world He gave His only Son... Believe in Him and have everlasting life.
    John 3:16

    NRA,,, Lifer

    United Air Epic Fail Video ...

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u99Q7pNAjvg

    Comment

    • #3
      JohnnyMtn
      Senior Member
      • Dec 2012
      • 1475

      Comment

      • #4
        sigfan91
        I need a LIFE!!
        • Jun 2009
        • 10268

        MSN is a portal. That's a Newsweek piece.

        Comment

        • #5
          SanDiego619
          I need a LIFE!!
          • Jan 2013
          • 11857

          I think they are covering for when they have to pull back on the mandates. The mandates will not work - too many people are going to refuse to take the shot.

          So now they don't want to look like they "lost", instead they will sacrifice fauci and use it as an excuse to stop the mandates.
          Where the people fear the government you have tyranny. Where the government fears the people you have liberty.

          Comment

          • #6
            M1NM
            Calguns Addict
            • Oct 2011
            • 7966

            How much of MSN does Gates own? Maybe he's getting ready to cut Fauci free.

            Comment

            • #7
              Fastattack
              Senior Member
              • Mar 2008
              • 1653

              In the not too distant past Newsweek would have never allowed this, but also big tech would have censored it. So two domino's down!

              Sent from my SM-A505U using Tapatalk

              Comment

              • #8
                sd_shooter
                I need a LIFE!!
                • Dec 2008
                • 13537

                Originally posted by SanDiego619
                I think they are covering for when they have to pull back on the mandates. The mandates will not work - too many people are going to refuse to take the shot.

                So now they don't want to look like they "lost", instead they will sacrifice fauci and use it as an excuse to stop the mandates.
                Yeah something's not right. It has to be about CYA, they're trying to establish a little credibility by being "fair & balanced."

                Comment

                • #9
                  sigfan91
                  I need a LIFE!!
                  • Jun 2009
                  • 10268

                  Originally posted by sd_shooter
                  Yeah something's not right. It has to be about CYA, they're trying to establish a little credibility by being "fair & balanced."
                  Hedging their bets.

                  Comment

                  • #10
                    Dan_Eastvale
                    I need a LIFE!!
                    • Apr 2013
                    • 10056

                    I'm hoping that soon overwhelming evidence will force them to criticize the mandates.

                    Comment

                    • #11
                      mshill
                      Veteran Member
                      • Dec 2012
                      • 4444

                      Originally posted by sigfan91
                      MSN is a portal. That's a Newsweek piece.
                      Yes,
                      It was, but MSN ran it. That is telling in and of itself. If you or I had posted an opinion like this on social media it would have been censored. The fact that two major media sources have published this is incredible. I also agree that it is CYA. The dems are getting slaughtered in Virginia and the media needs to start walking back the mandate BS before they lose too much more ground in 2022.
                      The American Republic will endure until the day Congress discovers that it can bribe the public with the public's money.

                      Comment

                      • #12
                        sigfan91
                        I need a LIFE!!
                        • Jun 2009
                        • 10268

                        Originally posted by mshill
                        Yes,
                        It was, but MSN ran it. That is telling in and of itself. If you or I had posted an opinion like this on social media it would have been censored. The fact that two major media sources have published this is incredible. I also agree that it is CYA. The dems are getting slaughtered in Virginia and the media needs to start walking back the mandate BS before they lose too much more ground in 2022.
                        I agree, Newsweek piece and actually carried by another portal is quite telling. I hope you're right. I hope this is only the beginning. Dems pushed things too far with the endless boosters and vaccine mandates. People would go along with the prank for a while just to humor them. Keep coming back for more will really piss people off.

                        Comment

                        • #13
                          ENTHUSIAST
                          Veteran Member
                          • Feb 2008
                          • 4440

                          Originally posted by sd_shooter
                          Yeah something's not right. It has to be about CYA, they're trying to establish a little credibility by being "fair & balanced."
                          They are making a move we will see how it goes but this is all really creepy at this point but I sense a change in not only direction but also tactics.

                          Comment

                          • #14
                            DentonandSasquatchShow
                            Senior Member
                            • Jun 2018
                            • 1343

                            Newsweek has been trying to go middle of the road for a while now. I'm not surprised by this. They are leaning with the wind.
                            I will stand for truth even if I stand alone.

                            The last time I had faith in the News was when it was with Huey Lewis.

                            Comment

                            • #15
                              The Gleam
                              I need a LIFE!!
                              • Feb 2011
                              • 12240

                              I said this about two weeks ago: that soon we would start to see 'breakthrough' stories exposing the kinks and cracks, and once one gets going, all the others start to file in for fear of missing out, whether that's to appeal to views to appease the advertisers, or simply fear of being left holding onto the bag of crap and looking dumb.

                              When one journalist broke ENRON, soon the same reporters touting Jeff Skilling and Ken Lay as genius just weeks earlier and fanning the unrealistic rise in the stock, were jumping on the band wagon suddenly acting like they had been reporting the downfall from the start.

                              Or on the dot-com crash, the subprime lending crash, Madoff, or Theranos/Holmes, Nikola's huckster Milton, Trump winning 2016 when they had all predicted Hillary winning by 67%, Biden's debacle exit out of Afghanistan.

                              This is an opinion piece, by someone with credibility, but if it goes wide enough, it can't be ignored and each news outlet, even the Leftists will be propping up their own versions of this guy for similar opinion pieces because the controversy gets the eyeballs.

                              Soon it moves from opinion, to research, to data, to reporters in the press-room firing investigative and skeptical questions at Psaki, Fauci, Walensky, and Biden until all of the latter are tripping over their tongues ( even though Biden does a good job of that without their help.)

                              Just needs to happen faster.

                              --
                              -----------------------------------------------
                              Originally posted by Librarian
                              What compelling interest has any level of government in knowing what guns are owned by civilians? (Those owned by government should be inventoried and tracked, for exactly the same reasons computers and desks and chairs are tracked: responsible care of public property.)

                              If some level of government had that information, what would they do with it? How would having that info benefit public safety? How would it benefit law enforcement?

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              UA-8071174-1