Study : discontinue use of mrna Vax for pregnant people

[sd_shooter]

First it was No more those under 30 (Sweden), now pregnant women should not take the vax! Tip of the iceberg?

https://cf5e727d-d02d-4d71-89ff-9fe2d3ad957f.filesusr.com/ugd/adf864_2bd97450072f4364a65e5cf1d7384dd4.pdf

https://100percentfedup.com/breaking-researchers-in-peer-reviewed-study-call-for-immediate-withdrawal-of-mrna-covid-vaccines-for-use-in-pregnancy-those-breastfeeding-those-of-childbearing-age-and-children/

[XDJYo]

[sigfan91]

Are they saying the Trump vaccine is "not safe nor effective" for pregnant women?

[M14 Junkie]

First it was No more those under 30 (Sweden), now pregnant women should not take the vax! Tip of the iceberg?

https://cf5e727d-d02d-4d71-89ff-9fe2d3ad957f.filesusr.com/ugd/adf864_2bd97450072f4364a65e5cf1d7384dd4.pdf

https://100percentfedup.com/breaking...-and-children/

Iv'e mentioned this before. I have a close relative who is an MRI tech who works at 3 different hospitals.

She has been telling us for quite a while now that there has been a huge increase in;

1. women having miscarriages.
2. Myocarditis, pericarditis.
3. people with cancers that were in remission suddenly coming back with a vengeance.
4.Autoimmune disorders.
5.Menstrual cycles in younger women totally messed up.
6.blood clots

Many are people who took the poison shots.

Doctors refuse to make a connection to the poison.

She swears because of her own personal experience via these patients, that she will never be vaxed-ever.

She applied for religious exemption from getting it and was accepted in writing by all three hospitals however, one is now telling her that they are "reviewing" their decision.

We'll see what happens. MRI techs are a critical specialist at hospitals and the question is can they afford to lose her.

[707electrician]

I am a pregnant trans woman

[OlderThanDirt]

Depress reproductivity for one or two generations, kill off the old, weak and infirm, and you have the main components of a global economic and societal reset.

[sd_shooter]

I see how Pete Buttgig got out of taking the vax (Should have seen it when he was running for POTUS - he's got great birthing hips!)

[MJB]

YOU SHOULD BE BANNED FOR THAT PIC

[Dan_Eastvale]

President and first "man"

[stix213]

The only thing that surprised me was people actually believed the CDC when they said it was safe for pregnant women. Since that was announced before it was even possible to know if it was safe or not. The CDC was just making **** up.

[SmokeTheClay]

That math doesn't seem to add up.

If 92% have a miscarriage in the first 13 weeks, then miscarriages by week 20 must be equal to or higher than 92%. But the article says by 20 weeks, miscarriages are at 81.9%, which is lower than 92%.

Is it a typo or am I missing something?

[anthonyca]

YOU SHOULD BE BANNED FOR THAT PIC

LMAO!!!!!!!! Thanks for the laugh!

[Wherryj]

First it was No more those under 30 (Sweden), now pregnant women should not take the vax! Tip of the iceberg?

https://cf5e727d-d02d-4d71-89ff-9fe2d3ad957f.filesusr.com/ugd/adf864_2bd97450072f4364a65e5cf1d7384dd4.pdf

https://100percentfedup.com/breaking...-and-children/

This is the strange thing. The CDC and FDA put up these reports that they claim are showing how "safe and effective" the vaccines are, but looking at those numbers makes anyone who is thinking realize that the vaccines are anything BUT safe.

The CDC PowerPoint supposedly proving safety for the 12-18 year group admitted that 16-18 year old boys were expected to suffer 56-69 cases of myocarditis per million vaccinations. That number is much lower than some other studies, but even if we accept it that is still at least 7 times the rate of myocarditis with previous coronavirus infections (usually about 10 per million in that age group).

Is this "hiding in plain sight" because they know that the house of cards will eventually collapse and someone will be held to account? Is this trying to pass it off as "we didn't think that was significant" rather than "oh, yeah you caught us outright lying on our data"? Just "adjust" the numbers down a bit then post still alarming numbers as proof of safety?

[turbolxstang]

You would have to have them define safe and also define effective, to them safe may be anything less than 10x the normal rate. But when you throw out those keywords, safe, effective, science and data, the masses just regurgitate it.

This is the strange thing. The CDC and FDA put up these reports that they claim are showing how "safe and effective" the vaccines are, but looking at those numbers makes anyone who is thinking realize that the vaccines are anything BUT safe.

The CDC PowerPoint supposedly proving safety for the 12-18 year group admitted that 16-18 year old boys were expected to suffer 56-69 cases of myocarditis per million vaccinations. That number is much lower than some other studies, but even if we accept it that is still at least 7 times the rate of myocarditis with previous coronavirus infections (usually about 10 per million in that age group).

Is this "hiding in plain sight" because they know that the house of cards will eventually collapse and someone will be held to account? Is this trying to pass it off as "we didn't think that was significant" rather than "oh, yeah you caught us outright lying on our data"? Just "adjust" the numbers down a bit then post still alarming numbers as proof of safety?

[theduracellbigd]

Wow shooter, four posts within a few hours on the COVID forum, geez did you drink too much coffee? Maybe a vacation back to Cali so you will lose some of that Texas boredom.