So CDC reports on deaths when fully "vaccinated"

[DaveInOroValley]

Good thing a real vaccine like the one for polio wasn't as bad. Calling this experimental shot a vaccine is like calling Biden competent.

https://townhall.com/tipsheet/katiepavlich/2021/10/19/former-cdc-director-gives-alarming-statistic-on-fully-vaccinated-covid-deaths-n2597628

[SoCal326]

Have you read about the development of the polio vaccine?

[Libertarian777]

ok come on, we get a post like this every week.

62% of Maryland is fully vaccinated
if 40% of deaths are fully vaccinated, then the clotshot is working.

3.6M vaccinated in Maryland
1.2M unvaccinated

say 1,000 people die
600 unvaccinated
400 vaccinated
40% of deaths are vaccinated
400 / 3,600,000 = 0.01%

60% of deaths are unvaccinated
600 / 1,200,000 = 0.05%

5X the rate.

But you actually have to remove the under 12 from the 1.2m unvaccinated since they do not factor into death rates, which is about 450K
so
600 / (1.2M - 0.45K) = 0.08% or 8X the rate

At least get the math right.

Simple rule of thumb, if % of deaths who are vaccinated are < vaccinated rate, then its a net positive.

[UCT]

ok come on, we get a post like this every week.

62% of Maryland is fully vaccinated
if 40% of deaths are fully vaccinated, then the clotshot is working.

3.6M vaccinated in Maryland
1.2M unvaccinated

say 1,000 people die
600 unvaccinated
400 vaccinated
40% of deaths are vaccinated
400 / 3,600,000 = 0.01%

60% of deaths are unvaccinated
600 / 1,200,000 = 0.05%

5X the rate.

But you actually have to remove the under 12 from the 1.2m unvaccinated since they do not factor into death rates, which is about 450K
so
600 / (1.2M - 0.45K) = 0.08% or 8X the rate

At least get the math right.

Simple rule of thumb, if % of deaths who are vaccinated are < vaccinated rate, then its a net positive.

You can't tell much from the numbers and you don't know if the vaccine is working or not from the information provided. What if I said most of the vaccinated who died were 25 to 30 year old men with no comorbidities. Would you say it works for men aged 25 to 30 because the vaccinated death rate is less than the vaccination rate?

Lies, damn lies and statistics

[SPUTTER]

The CDC has maintained the position of hiding the vaccinated deaths, that's a fact.
Death rates maintain a certain level from one year to the next. If the number of deaths go up this year and next year compared to previous years, it's clearly the vaccine.

[stix213]

ok come on, we get a post like this every week.

62% of Maryland is fully vaccinated
if 40% of deaths are fully vaccinated, then the clotshot is working.

3.6M vaccinated in Maryland
1.2M unvaccinated

say 1,000 people die
600 unvaccinated
400 vaccinated
40% of deaths are vaccinated
400 / 3,600,000 = 0.01%

60% of deaths are unvaccinated
600 / 1,200,000 = 0.05%

5X the rate.

But you actually have to remove the under 12 from the 1.2m unvaccinated since they do not factor into death rates, which is about 450K
so
600 / (1.2M - 0.45K) = 0.08% or 8X the rate

At least get the math right.

Simple rule of thumb, if % of deaths who are vaccinated are < vaccinated rate, then its a net positive.

The problem with the math is asymmetrical testing. It is standard practice in hospitals right now that if you're admitted for any reason, you get a covid test if you're unvaxxed and not if you're vaxxed.

If you come in from a car crash and are unvaxxed you get tested.. If PCR says covid, you're now an unvaxxed covid hospitalization statistic. If you die from the crash, you're an unvaxxed covid death. If you were vaxxed, you wouldn't even be tested. You would only be tested if you came in specifically for covid symptoms.

So we've got a situation where 40% of covid deaths are people who specifically were admitted for covid and died of covid for the vaxxed stat, compared to the 60% who are unvaxxed and admitted to the hospital and died for any reason after a positive pcr. That should be rather frightening for the vaccinated.