Articles on both Ivermectin and Malaria

[OleCuss]

Here's the one on Malaria: https://www.bbc.com/news/health-58810551

Note that this is a vaccine which is in the range of 30-40% effective. The idea that a vaccine is by definition 100% effective is unsupported and this being another vaccine which is nowhere near 100% effective illustrates that.

There's also a mention about how immunity is built. Repeated exposures to build up immunity. Malaria is likely much more difficult to build up immunity for but the basic idea is the same for a virus such as Covid-19. Repeated small exposures could give you multiple asymptomatic infections or mildly symptomatic infections which will build immunity over time.



This is an article about Ivermectin and Covid-19 which is not written for medical professionals: https://www.bbc.com/news/health-58170809 It highlights the problems with the studies which showed benefit and it is consistent with other analyses which politely roasted those studies. The net effect is that there is no decent (let alone good) evidence that Ivermectin is useful in the treatment of Covid-19.

[user120312]

If/when corroborated, information coming out about members of Congress and their families being treated with an Ivermectin protocol over the last 15 months and the results should be enlightening on a number of fronts.

https://twitter.com/PierreKory/status/1446312291302055940

https://twitter.com/Covid19Critical/status/1446478304899485698

Fun fact: Between 100-200 United States Congress Members (plus many of their staffers & family members) with COVID.. were treated by a colleague over the past 15 months with ivermectin & the I-MASK+ protocol at http://flccc.net. None have gone to hospital. Just sayin'

Frontline Covid-19 Critical Care

@Covid19Critical


Friends, we would not have tweeted something of this magnitude and importance without knowing for certain that it was true, and that the source was unassailable.

I dealt with the bioweapon three times untreated and have no dog in the treatment fight; however considering lives are and have been at stake and possible treatments have been denied or made difficult to obtain this kind of information is revealing about what truly is going on. Pay attention to the realities. They are what they are.

[Term]

Ha Ha, the BBC , might as well be CNN or CNBC.

The Ivermectin deniers lost all credibility when they tried to convince everybody it was only
"horse paste".

They hate this drug with a passion because its CHEAP !!

Why no hate for the approved drug Remdesivir ? It clearly doesn't work and has terrible side effects, but its ok because it costs 3k.

[stonefly-2]

Here's the one on Malaria: https://www.bbc.com/news/health-58810551

Note that this is a vaccine which is in the range of 30-40% effective. The idea that a vaccine is by definition 100% effective is unsupported and this being another vaccine which is nowhere near 100% effective illustrates that.

There's also a mention about how immunity is built. Repeated exposures to build up immunity. Malaria is likely much more difficult to build up immunity for but the basic idea is the same for a virus such as Covid-19. Repeated small exposures could give you multiple asymptomatic infections or mildly symptomatic infections which will build immunity over time.



This is an article about Ivermectin and Covid-19 which is not written for medical professionals: https://www.bbc.com/news/health-58170809 It highlights the problems with the studies which showed benefit and it is consistent with other analyses which politely roasted those studies. The net effect is that there is no decent (let alone good) evidence that Ivermectin is useful in the treatment of Covid-19.

If they wanted to refute the effectiveness of Ivermectin and they had the
truth on their side they could simply dispute the long list of patients that didn't become dead bodies.

Until they do that you can be sure you are being lied to.

[Wherryj]

In the other direction, how is a medication used to prevent malaria considered so horrifically deadly if used for the plandemic?

Then, there is this. If confirmed, the Dems might have some 'splainin' to do.

[nedro]

Here's the one on Malaria: https://www.bbc.com/news/health-58810551

Note that this is a vaccine which is in the range of 30-40% effective. The idea that a vaccine is by definition 100% effective is unsupported and this being another vaccine which is nowhere near 100% effective illustrates that.

There's also a mention about how immunity is built. Repeated exposures to build up immunity. Malaria is likely much more difficult to build up immunity for but the basic idea is the same for a virus such as Covid-19. Repeated small exposures could give you multiple asymptomatic infections or mildly symptomatic infections which will build immunity over time.



This is an article about Ivermectin and Covid-19 which is not written for medical professionals: https://www.bbc.com/news/health-58170809 It highlights the problems with the studies which showed benefit and it is consistent with other analyses which politely roasted those studies. The net effect is that there is no decent (let alone good) evidence that Ivermectin is useful in the treatment of Covid-19.

This is a pathetic and selfish post.
Let me guess, you got the jab.
Not to mention the lying sack-O-Stuff articles you posted.

[Libertarian777]

John Campbell takes the BBC article on ivermectin apart pretty well.

https://youtu.be/zy7c_FHiEac

Written by a student...
Not much links / references or data provided.

John Campbell is a proponent of the covid vaccines...

[Term]

John Campbell takes the BBC article on ivermectin apart pretty well.

https://youtu.be/zy7c_FHiEac

Written by a student...
Not much links / references or data provided.

John Campbell is a proponent of the covid vaccines...