Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

Judge Rules in Favor of Ohio Hospital Requiring Vaccinations for Employees

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • TrappedinCalifornia
    Calguns Addict
    • Jan 2018
    • 9045

    Judge Rules in Favor of Ohio Hospital Requiring Vaccinations for Employees

    Judge rules in favor of St. E requiring vaccinations for employees

    The "20 page" ruling is embedded in .pdf in the article or can be viewed full size... Here.

    At some point, SCOTUS is likely to have to settle this whole thing in that the Judge, as in the Houston nurses case, ruled largely on the employment laws and dismissed/deferred when it came to vaccination laws and the issues presented in relation to the current vaccines.
    Last edited by TrappedinCalifornia; 09-26-2021, 4:53 PM.
  • #2
    The Gleam
    I need a LIFE!!
    • Feb 2011
    • 12256

    Originally posted by TrappedinCalifornia
    At some point, SCOTUS is likely to have to settle this whole thing in that the Judge, as in the Houston nurses case, ruled largely on the employment laws and dismissed/deferred when it came to vaccination laws and the issues presented in relation to the current vaccines.
    With so much support/money/politics and false science behind this issue, it will likely get appealed. I also suspect it will run all the way up the ladder, especially as there are dozens of lawsuits waiting in the wings for the supposed OSHA regs to be published. Once that happens, we'll see injunctions, numerous strategies, the works.
    -----------------------------------------------
    Originally posted by Librarian
    What compelling interest has any level of government in knowing what guns are owned by civilians? (Those owned by government should be inventoried and tracked, for exactly the same reasons computers and desks and chairs are tracked: responsible care of public property.)

    If some level of government had that information, what would they do with it? How would having that info benefit public safety? How would it benefit law enforcement?

    Comment

    • #3
      Oceanbob
      I need a LIFE!!
      • Jun 2010
      • 12719

      Probably the first of many decisions and eventually the Supreme Court.
      May the Bridges I burn light the way.

      Life Is Not About Waiting For The Storm To Pass - Its About Learning To Dance In The Rain.

      Fewer people are killed with all rifles each year (323 in 2011) than with shotguns (356), hammers and clubs (496), and hands and feet (728).

      Comment

      • #4
        seal20
        Veteran Member
        • Nov 2008
        • 3081

        Quit. The hospitals need the staff more than the staff needs that crap. The supreme court can eat a bag of Johnsons.

        Comment

        • #5
          bohoki
          I need a LIFE!!
          • Jan 2006
          • 20815

          they are at will employees i sure hope the hospital doesnt have to close floors for short staff

          Comment

          • #6
            Dan_Eastvale
            I need a LIFE!!
            • Apr 2013
            • 10078

            Likely be able to find essential employees at a "fake emergency" allowance of double salary

            Comment

            • #7
              stormvet
              I need a LIFE!!
              • Mar 2010
              • 12254

              If it really was about life and death a real public safety emergency there would be no religious and medical exemptions. The fact that there are loopholes tells you how important the vax really is to public safety.

              If everyone is not vaccinated a plague will wreck havoc on the earth, but if you got a exemption that’s ok don’t worry about it…what?
              Im a warmonger baby, I got blood in my eyes and I'm looking at you.

              Comment

              • #8
                The Gleam
                I need a LIFE!!
                • Feb 2011
                • 12256

                Don't forget the illegal alien and celebrity exemptions.

                ---
                -----------------------------------------------
                Originally posted by Librarian
                What compelling interest has any level of government in knowing what guns are owned by civilians? (Those owned by government should be inventoried and tracked, for exactly the same reasons computers and desks and chairs are tracked: responsible care of public property.)

                If some level of government had that information, what would they do with it? How would having that info benefit public safety? How would it benefit law enforcement?

                Comment

                • #9
                  norcalAF
                  CGN/CGSSA Contributor
                  CGN Contributor
                  • Jul 2012
                  • 1654

                  Originally posted by The Gleam
                  Don't forget the illegal alien and celebrity exemptions.

                  ---
                  and all of congress and their staff...

                  Comment

                  • #10
                    stix213
                    AKA: Joe Censored
                    CGN Contributor - Lifetime
                    • Apr 2009
                    • 18998

                    Originally posted by norcalAF
                    and all of congress and their staff...
                    Congress being exempt is a separation of powers issue. The executive branch lacks the authority to mandate pretty much anything on the legislative branch.

                    Comment

                    • #11
                      The Gleam
                      I need a LIFE!!
                      • Feb 2011
                      • 12256

                      Originally posted by stix213
                      Congress being exempt is a separation of powers issue. The executive branch lacks the authority to mandate pretty much anything on the legislative branch.
                      It's a branch for sure; a whole stick up their butt, and it's full of nuts.

                      --
                      -----------------------------------------------
                      Originally posted by Librarian
                      What compelling interest has any level of government in knowing what guns are owned by civilians? (Those owned by government should be inventoried and tracked, for exactly the same reasons computers and desks and chairs are tracked: responsible care of public property.)

                      If some level of government had that information, what would they do with it? How would having that info benefit public safety? How would it benefit law enforcement?

                      Comment

                      • #12
                        stix213
                        AKA: Joe Censored
                        CGN Contributor - Lifetime
                        • Apr 2009
                        • 18998

                        Religious and medical exemptions are longstanding law. If the Democrats had the votes to change that I wouldn't be surprised if they would, but Republicans would get destroyed if they went along with removing religious exemptions. There's also a good chance the SCOTUS would rule a vaccine mandate to be a violation of the 1A if it required people to violate their religious beliefs.

                        Comment

                        • #13
                          SPUTTER
                          Calguns Addict
                          • Jun 2009
                          • 7504

                          Religious and medical exemptions are not loopholes. You're sounding like the NY governor.

                          Comment

                          • #14
                            Marthor
                            Senior Member
                            • Oct 2011
                            • 1644

                            The post office is also fully exempt from getting the shots. The single most important organization to the survival of the Democrat Party is the vote by mail scheme using the US Post Office
                            National Rifle Association (NRA) Life Patriot Endowment Member
                            Single Action Shooting Society (SASS) Member
                            Concealed Handgun License
                            Originally posted by Marthor
                            You have been scammed bigly. Epic hype. Time to snap out. YW

                            Comment

                            • #15
                              gimebakmybulits
                              CGN/CGSSA Contributor
                              CGN Contributor
                              • Feb 2007
                              • 992

                              Originally posted by SPUTTER
                              Religious and medical exemptions are not loopholes. You're sounding like the NY governor.
                              He's making a valid point so don't let your beliefs cause a knee jerk reaction. It's the same with masks, if they were effective there would be clear and concise models and instructions/procedures to use and follow.
                              If this was the zombie apocalypse, there would be no exemptions.....period. But it's not...not even close...hence no continuity on response to the "pandemic"
                              "Firearms are second only to the Constitution in importance; they are the peoples' liberty's teeth."
                              George Washington

                              "The constitutions of most of our States assert that all power is inherent in the people; that... it is their right and duty to be at all times armed."
                              Thomas Jefferson

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              UA-8071174-1