Boosters not needed

[sigstroker]

A new review authored by a group of international scientists and published by the Lancet suggeststhat booster doses of the COVID-19 vaccine may not be currently needed for the general population.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/money/news/why-moderna-biontech-novavax-and-pfizer-are-trading-lower/ar-AAOosKu

And under the heading of "this is weird":

Former Pfizer VP Warns Booster Shot Is An Extermination Weapon To Mass Murder Human Beings

Warning - the article is a little, um, biased.

https://www.citizensjournal.us/former-pfizer-vp-warns-booster-shot-is-an-extermination-weapon-to-mass-murder-human-beings/

[wpage]

Well well well, let the controversy continue.

Eenie meenie mine moe...

[glock17_1986]

That's weird. I thought most of them were all about boosters to keep the money train rolling.

Also the ex Pfizer vp is surprising. Never would have expected that.

[numpty]

"Thus, widespread boosting should be undertaken only if there is clear evidence that it is appropriate," scientists said.

Oh, c'mon man. That's not how "science" works anymore.

[sigstroker]

The headline I'd seen in a different article said that Pfizer and Moderna chimed in on the Lancet article about boosters not being needed. They're cutting their own profits by saying that.

I didn't post the Lancet article because they're very clinical instead of getting to the bottom line in the first 50 pages.

[RCBS]

Pure bloods need no 'booster'.

[Deadon]

Booster to the moon! You should read what these crazy people on dem underground are saying. They want it now! Lol. Crazy people.

Meanwhile we have now idea what the long term or short term sides are from the first two because they don't have to disclose until 2023. I've seriously never seen so many people that see what's going on with the FDA ect and then still say give it to me! What the gell is wrong with people? I swear people ask more questions when they buy a car.

[cleonard]

Not every scientist is a dogma following drone. Most actual follow the data. That is what is going on here. It's those that already have the results before they ever collect data that you have to watch out for.

Boosters almost for sure will have a worse side effect profile than the initial doses had.

[LovingTheYear1911]

Pfizer has already made billions upon billions of dollars. They can wait a little longer before they come out saying boosters are needed.

[AK5.56]

Pure bloods need no 'booster'.

[Deadon]

Pfizer has already made billions upon billions of dollars. They can wait a little longer before they come out saying boosters are needed.

They are already saying they're needed. Lol imagine making a "vaccine " then saying it works. Then saying you need two pills a day made by Pfizer AND boosters every six months.

I really can't stand people anymore. People fall for this chit? Seriously, I've lost faith in America.

"Pfizer says it's time for a Covid booster; FDA and CDC say not so fast"

[sd_shooter]

The first shot isn't needed either

[SPUTTER]

It's not needed but Klaus Schwab says you will take it anyways. You know... because you're breathing his air.

[Rottentofu]

"The article broached the issue of incremental risks if boosters are widely introduced too soon, or too frequently, especially with vaccines that can have immune-mediated side-effects.

If unnecessary boosting causes significant adverse reactions, there could be implications for vaccine acceptance that go beyond COVID-19 vaccines, the medical journal article said."

More and more scientists across the world are supporting these findings.

I'm just waiting for Bob to come in and call this "fake news".