The Daily Wire gives Xiden the finger over vax mandates

[GOEX FFF]

Hopefully more companies follow suit.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X-jmOts8Jr0

[L84CABO]

Awesome! Hopefully a lot of other businesses do the same.

[axhoaxho]

Amen!

Hopefully more companies follow suit.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X-jmOts8Jr0

[The Gleam]

Nicely done, well stated. There are going to be thousands of similar companies that follow suit, and Biden's wet-dream will die as fast as it was thought up. Courts will have a field day with this.

Really appreciate the stress that it's not following the science, and emphasizing that the pseudo-vaccinated still spread and transmit Sars-CoV2 as much and as readily as anyone else, so the idea of a pseudo-vaccine mandate is clearly political versus meaningful.

If they try to make the argument that it's about protecting the health of individuals and supposedly keeping them from filling up ICUs - just what comes next? Banning motorcycles and bicycles? Banning skate-boarding? Banning surfing? Banning bathtubs? Banning contact sports?

ALL are activities that lead to a high frequency of head-injuries that cause people to end up in ICUs which by banning these activities, would surely stop such injuries.

Next thing you know, they'll abolish the 2nd Amendment by making the same kind of claim, that gun ownership leads to an unnecessary flow of injuries that clog ICUs, thus guns must be banned.

[Lmo]

"This isn't about freedom, or personal choice..."

"We've been patient," Biden told the tens of millions of Americans who have declined to get coronavirus shots. "But our patience is wearing thin, and your refusal has cost all of us."

Arrogant f uc cking bas tard

[BrokerB]

Tea Party

[happyvirus]

We NEED more REAL Patriots.

[200Apples]

"This isn't about freedom, or personal choice..."

Au contraire, Your Fraudulency. Au contraire.

"We've been patient," Biden told the tens of millions of Americans who have declined to get coronavirus shots. "But our patience is wearing thin, and your refusal has cost all of us."

Arrogant f uc cking bas tard

I had similar thoughts when I saw/heard that douchebag utter those lies.

[Wherryj]

Nicely done, well stated. There are going to be thousands of similar companies that follow suit, and Biden's wet-dream will die as fast as it was thought up. Courts will have a field day with this.

Really appreciate the stress that it's not following the science, and emphasizing that the pseudo-vaccinated still spread and transmit Sars-CoV2 as much and as readily as anyone else, so the idea of a pseudo-vaccine mandate is clearly political versus meaningful.

If they try to make the argument that it's about protecting the health of individuals and supposedly keeping them from filling up ICUs - just what comes next? Banning motorcycles and bicycles? Banning skate-boarding? Banning surfing? Banning bathtubs? Banning contact sports?

ALL are activities that lead to a high frequency of head-injuries that cause people to end up in ICUs which by banning these activities, would surely stop such injuries.

Next thing you know, they'll abolish the 2nd Amendment by making the same kind of claim, that gun ownership leads to an unnecessary flow of injuries that clog ICUs, thus guns must be banned.

Perhaps they should ban drugs? Misuse of those leads to a lot of ICU admissions. That should fix things.

[Wherryj]

There's a major issue with the vaccines at this point that all of these "scientists" aren't discussing. The vaccine was given emergency approval while studies were still ongoing. Somehow, without finishing the phase III clinical trials, the vaccine is suddenly "proven safe". Ok, VERY unusual, but so long as those phase III trials are still ongoing, right? They promise data by 2023...

Well, after the vaccine was approved, that meant that the company decided that the vaccine was "safe and effective" (mind you WITHOUT the trial actually being completed) so they decided that it wasn't "ethical" to continue with the placebo group and they vaccinated the ENTIRE placebo group.

These trials MUST compare safety and effectiveness compared to placebo, at least until there is at least ONE treatment that HAS done so. At that point it is fairly common to conclude that a placebo group is unethical because there is a proven treatment, so the new treatment is compared to the old treatment.

It isn't necessarily true, but at least then you have "Product A" that HAS been proven effective and safe compared to placebo in a randomized, double blinded study. Now you can compare Product A to the new Product B with a randomized, double blinded trial and hope that "If A>placebo and B>/= A THEN B is proven safe and effective", but this is a statistical stretch.

It always ends up essentially comparing groups that may not be randomized compared to one another. Two randomized groups from different studies can still have statistical differences compared to one another, even though that may not be common. If that's the case, any difference between the two is possibly just random chance. It is a concession that must be made if one doesn't want the unethical situation of denying a percentage of the study a KNOWN safe and effective treatment, however.

There was NO reason to do that in this case. Destroying the placebo group may make political sense as it is trying to state, "Hey, we've proven it so safe and effective that we can't possibly NOT vaccinate anyone", but this hasn't been proven and now NEVER CAN BE PROVEN.

To prove it safe you NEED to be able to compare adverse reactions to placebo. You no longer can do that, especially for long term side effects. To prove it is effective you NEED to be able to compare outcomes for treated vs. non-treated groups, something that you NO LONGER CAN DO.

If you now compare the test subjects against just random unvaccinated, you no longer have controlled groups and there are very likely differences between those people, differences that make any "difference between treatments" far more likely to be due to statistical anomaly than the treatment itself.

This is junk science at its worst. The vaccine MIGHT be safe and effective, but now they've thrown away ANY ability to prove it. I had a molecular biology professor in undergrad who did research that failed almost my entire section on the laboratory testing. He was a stickler for asking questions that weren't directly from the experiments. We would study what the lab test supposedly proved, only to have him throw in things that weren't discussed such as, "List 40 assumptions that you made about the experimental set up that could impact the results". Unless EVERY OTHER aspect of the study is properly controlled, the results are trash, and he was trying to teach us that these could NEVER be fully controlled, but a good researcher would make EVERY possible attempt to control as many as possible. He would be appalled at this "study".

[glilon]

Nicely done, well stated. There are going to be thousands of similar companies that follow suit, and Biden's wet-dream will die as fast as it was thought up. Courts will have a field day with this.

Really appreciate the stress that it's not following the science, and emphasizing that the pseudo-vaccinated still spread and transmit Sars-CoV2 as much and as readily as anyone else, so the idea of a pseudo-vaccine mandate is clearly political versus meaningful.

If they try to make the argument that it's about protecting the health of individuals and supposedly keeping them from filling up ICUs - just what comes next? Banning motorcycles and bicycles? Banning skate-boarding? Banning surfing? Banning bathtubs? Banning contact sports?

ALL are activities that lead to a high frequency of head-injuries that cause people to end up in ICUs which by banning these activities, would surely stop such injuries.

Next thing you know, they'll abolish the 2nd Amendment by making the same kind of claim, that gun ownership leads to an unnecessary flow of injuries that clog ICUs, thus guns must be banned.

Then they can explain to the courts why the USPS is mysteriously exempted from the vaccine mandate.

[GlockN'Roll]

This dooffus is pro-Vaxxx jab, and admits that he would do the very same thing if he was a dictator.

A virtue signaling bozo at best...

[The Gleam]

This dooffus is pro-Vaxxx jab, and admits that he would do the very same thing if he was a dictator.

A virtue signaling bozo at best...

You're missing the point. He's saying it that way to call Biden a dictator, which with this move, he is - not that we didn't already know that's what he wants, absolute power and control, a socialist norm, and that Harris will gladly slip on those Imelda shoes if Biden keels over.

Surely you realized that; it was really obvious.

[M14 Junkie]

Very good. However he did not mention the glaring postal worker exemption (600K worth, which is a loophole beneficial to those who plan to steal elections) as an example of hypocrisy.

[Dan_Eastvale]

Most Dems feed off the bird flipped by the GOP