Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

Annual booster shots will NOT be required

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • #31
    Bert Gamble
    Veteran Member
    • Mar 2011
    • 3230

    Where are those who said there would be no need of a booster? Would be great if they owned up to it.

    They will just deflect, like the MSM is for Biden. Today there are articles on Yahoo about how Trump would have done the same thing instead of what Biden did do.
    WARNING: This post will most likely contain statements that are offensive to those who lack wit, humor, common sense, and or maturity.

    Satire: A literary composition, in verse or prose, in which human folly and vice are held up to scorn, derision, or ridicule.
    _____________________________________________

    Comment

    • #32
      Marthor
      Senior Member
      • Oct 2011
      • 1644

      The next new variant will require mandatory 4th booster shot and double mask for all.
      National Rifle Association (NRA) Life Patriot Endowment Member
      Single Action Shooting Society (SASS) Member
      Concealed Handgun License
      Originally posted by Marthor
      You have been scammed bigly. Epic hype. Time to snap out. YW

      Comment

      • #33
        five.five-six
        CGN Contributor
        • May 2006
        • 34813

        Originally posted by Bert Gamble
        Where are those who said there would be no need of a booster? Would be great if they owned up to it.

        They will just deflect, like the MSM is for Biden. Today there are articles on Yahoo about how Trump would have done the same thing instead of what Biden did do.

        Comment

        • #34
          ibanezfoo
          I need a LIFE!!
          • Apr 2007
          • 11728

          Originally posted by stix213
          You didn't already fall for the covid lottery?
          I got the China flu way back. Wasn't super fun but certainly not worth getting injected with anything over.
          vindicta inducit ad salutem?

          Comment

          • #35
            BucDan
            Veteran Member
            • Dec 2011
            • 4062

            Keep at it. Sooner or later vaxxbros will stop vaxxmaxxing.

            Comment

            • #36
              The Tiger
              Senior Member
              • Feb 2012
              • 1989

              Originally posted by five.five-six
              Twitter has already nurfed that tweet.
              I hate that they can mark something as misleading without telling you why, specifically.
              sigpic
              NRA Benefactor
              CRPA Life Member
              GOA Member

              Comment

              • #37
                The Gleam
                I need a LIFE!!
                • Feb 2011
                • 12271

                Originally posted by Bert Gamble
                Where are those who said there would be no need of a booster? Would be great if they owned up to it.
                They have: the World Health Organization (WHO... is right) has countered our illustrious Xiden along with the politically motivated CDC, to advise that Booster shots of the pseudo-vaccines are NOT needed.

                That's W.H.O.

                Talk about a chaotic, mismanaged, no-confidence situation, on top of all the subterfuge and propaganda, it only further encourages skepticism of the efficacy of these pseudo-vaccines, and warrants caution about future unknown side effects yet to be revealed in this largest long-run experiment unleashed on the masses.

                ----
                -----------------------------------------------
                Originally posted by Librarian
                What compelling interest has any level of government in knowing what guns are owned by civilians? (Those owned by government should be inventoried and tracked, for exactly the same reasons computers and desks and chairs are tracked: responsible care of public property.)

                If some level of government had that information, what would they do with it? How would having that info benefit public safety? How would it benefit law enforcement?

                Comment

                • #38
                  The Gleam
                  I need a LIFE!!
                  • Feb 2011
                  • 12271

                  Originally posted by The Tiger
                  I hate that they can mark something as misleading without telling you why, specifically.

                  Or racist, or transphobic, or misogynist, or Islamphobic, or commuphobic, Marxiphobic, socialistphobic, metrosexualphobic, crimephobic, paedophiliphobic, and so on - whatever they wish to defend this week.

                  ----
                  -----------------------------------------------
                  Originally posted by Librarian
                  What compelling interest has any level of government in knowing what guns are owned by civilians? (Those owned by government should be inventoried and tracked, for exactly the same reasons computers and desks and chairs are tracked: responsible care of public property.)

                  If some level of government had that information, what would they do with it? How would having that info benefit public safety? How would it benefit law enforcement?

                  Comment

                  • #39
                    Marthor
                    Senior Member
                    • Oct 2011
                    • 1644

                    There is new terminology going around for all people that get a 3rd booster shot

                    = Vaxxtard
                    National Rifle Association (NRA) Life Patriot Endowment Member
                    Single Action Shooting Society (SASS) Member
                    Concealed Handgun License
                    Originally posted by Marthor
                    You have been scammed bigly. Epic hype. Time to snap out. YW

                    Comment

                    • #40
                      A-J
                      Veteran Member
                      • Dec 2011
                      • 2582

                      Originally posted by The Tiger
                      I hate that they can mark something as misleading without telling you why, specifically.
                      I hate more that they think it's their responsibility to keep me from being misled.
                      It was not a threat. It was an exaggerated response to an uncompromising stance. I was taught never to make a threat unless you are prepared to carry it out and I am not a fan of carrying anything. Even watching other people carrying things makes me uncomfortable. Mainly because of the possibility they may ask me to help.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      UA-8071174-1