A digestible explanation of the concern over spike protein shedding.

[stonefly-2]

https://rumble.com/vg2s47-doctor-explains-why-you-should-keep-away-from-vaccinated-sheeps.html

Que shillage to discredit the source.

[SoCal326]

Haha, the link just points to other links but here's a quote from the article.

"AND the so-called vaccines are NOT Vaccines they are gene therapy intended to mutate your DNA. They are not really "trying" to kill masses but they are happy to have masses die as COLLATERAL DAMAGE...in order to jump to humanity 3.0 --- a race of CYBORGS AND ANDROIDS....they know certain bloodlines and certain Genetics can handle this type of transition better than others... THIS IS THE REAL AGENDA AND FOCUS....the nano in chemtrails for the last 20 years has been preparing your bodies for this next step!"

[SPUTTER]

^Where did you get that? It's not an article, it's a video.

[stonefly-2]

^Where did you get that? It's not an article, it's a video.

Perhaps he has some reason to not want people to look at it.

Trying to create the impression it does not exist might do that on a some scale......what cost personal credibility?

[SPUTTER]

Perhaps he has some reason to not want people to look at it.

Trying to create the impression it does not exist might do that on a some scale......what cost personal credibility?

Well that's lazy of him. At least he could've written down a word salad of mental gymnastics lies like some of the other guys.

[SoCal326]

^Where did you get that? It's not an article, it's a video.

There's a video and below it there are 2 links. I followed the first link. Here it is. I can't trust someone that posts this sort of garbage. Nome of us should.

The video starts off with honest info and quickly turns into half truth to spread fear.

Some here accuse the left of spreading fear with science then those same people come here and try to spread fear with lies.

This is exactly what our enemies want. Spread fear, uncertainty and doubt so we fight amongst ourselves instead of staying united.

https://rumble.com/vfwv7z-nurse-warns-stay-away-from-vaxxed-people.html

[SPUTTER]

There's a video and below it there are 2 links. I followed the first link. Here it is. I can't trust someone that posts this sort of garbage. Nome of us should.


https://rumble.com/vfwv7z-nurse-warn...ed-people.html

The video posted is a Dr. talking about the mRNA vaccine and shedding. So you are saying this theory is nonsense?

[SoCal326]

https://rumble.com/vg2s47-doctor-exp...ed-sheeps.html



Que shillage to discredit the source.

And in case he deletes his post ill quote it here.

[stonefly-2]

And in case he deletes his post ill quote it here.

Why would I delete it?

It is SIMPLY a digestible explanation of the premise.

My close was in hope of avoiding just this lesson in remedial reading.

[SoCal326]

Why would I delete it?



It is SIMPLY a digestible explanation of the premise.



My close was in hope of avoiding just this lesson in remedial reading.

The source discredits itself. The video starts with a polarizing screenshot of a sheep on a liscense and the following links are a bunch of obvious conspiracy theory BS. Any site that has links like that can't be trusted.

If you want to learn about the topic of shedding read some articles on pubmed. This video is made to create fear, not to inform.

It also shows that you do nothing to verify your sources

[stonefly-2]

The source discredits itself. The video starts with a polarizing screenshot of a sheep on a liscense and the following links are a bunch of obvious conspiracy theory BS. Any site that has links like that can't be trusted.

If you want to learn about the topic of shedding read some articles on pubmed. This video is made to create fear, not to inform.

It also shows that you do nothing to verify your sources

I'm not sure I follow your train of thought here.

You saw the video and understood it,

you saw the video and found it not dumbed down enough for your liking or

you saw ahead of time it was going to conflict with your point of view,

stuck your fingers in your ears and now regale us with a chorus of la la la la ?

[bigmike82]

Here's the biggest issue with his ... 'analysis'.

He conflates Covid as a virus with the spike protein.

He tries to argue that all of the harm is caused by the spike protein (right around 330 - 400).

He is saying, definitively, that the spike protein does all the harm.

That's ... clearly false. He goes on to say that by making the spike protein we are giving people 'symptoms of Covid 19'.

The data very clearly shows this is utterly false. IF what he says were true, people with the vaccine would be dying and showing symptoms of illness at the same rate as people naturally infected.

IF, and ONLY IF, you assume that the spike protein IS all that's necessary for Covid, he would be right.

But he isn't.

Covid requires far more than the spike protein to spread.

[stonefly-2]

Here's the biggest issue with his ... 'analysis'.

He conflates Covid as a virus with the spike protein.

He tries to argue that all of the harm is caused by the spike protein (right around 330 - 400).

He is saying, definitively, that the spike protein does all the harm.

That's ... clearly false. He goes on to say that by making the spike protein we are giving people 'symptoms of Covid 19'.

The data very clearly shows this is utterly false. IF what he says were true, people with the vaccine would be dying and showing symptoms of illness at the same rate as people naturally infected.

IF, and ONLY IF, you assume that the spike protein IS all that's necessary for Covid, he would be right.

But he isn't.

Covid requires far more than the spike protein to spread.

My take is that he distinguishes between the effect of the Covid virus and the effect of our bodies reaction to the MRNA treatment.

Never the less I think he defines the concern clearly.

I don't necessarily subscribe to his characterization believe it or not but you come closer to being able to discuss it dispassionately than others.

Verify sources" ?......PUH-LEEZE.....with who?

Any media source?, our once trusted medical industry?, the government?.....not seeing that opportunity myself.

Chewing the fat on these things is about the only way I see,
what's actually BS will reveal itself.

There are 2 schools of thought on this,
the "will/haves" and "never gonnas".

Now we wait.

[SPUTTER]

Didn't Pfizer admit they observed shedding during clinical trials?

[theLBC]

we can't believe anything .gov says.

how many did they kill by saying hcq was deadly, and blocking its use?

remember when they were murdering hiv patients with lethal doses of azt?