Had the Wu-Flu, why get jab?

[hermosabeach]

No one knows.....

Honest Answer

The Antibody Levels from 2 vaccine shots is 10 times higher than for those who had the flu....


If you are not traveling to the EU or have health conditions, probably not needed until we know a lot more

[mshill]

No one knows.....

Honest Answer

The Antibody Levels from 2 vaccine shots is 10 times higher than for those who had the flu....


If you are not traveling to the EU or have health conditions, probably not needed until we know a lot more

Do you have a citation for the bolded?

[DolphinFan]

Serious question... if I had the China virus why in the world would I need a vaccine?

I know a lot of people that had it that are getting vaccinated. Why?

Is my bodies immune system not good enough?
Is a vaccine that is "95% effective" (whatever that means) better than my bodies natural response?

My thoughts....

Considering that only about 12% of the population has come down with the wu-flu and of that 12% there is a 99.7% survival rate seems like the human body is well over "95% effective".

What exactly does "95٪ effective" mean anyway? They admit it doesn't keep you from getting covid. They admit that it doesn't prevent you from infecting others. What exactly is it "effectively" doing that my body cannot do on its own?

There seems to be no logic behind it.

I agree with you 1,000%

I'm getting a blood test next week to see if i have any antibodies. Either way I'm not going to be the subject of clinical trials and will wait until a vaccine is approved by the FDA, and even ten I may not get it as I don't get an annual flu shot.

[as_rocketman]

Do you have a citation for the bolded?

Here is a cite for you. Note this is a preprint, so check back for updates. But it clearly demonstrates the superior immunization conferred by the vaccine compared to surviving infection.

The theory is pretty simple: While the vaccine merely creates inactive proteins with weird signatures for your body to train against, actual infection causes a whole host of effects -- and some of those are immunosuppressive. Depending on exactly how your recovery went, you might acquire lasting, effective immunity, and you might not. Vaccination after infection should improve your response just like a second dose improves on the first.

The statistical trade is, however, more complicated than it would be for someone who had not yet been challenged.

[sigstroker]

Serious question... if I had the China virus why in the world would I need a vaccine?

I know a lot of people that had it that are getting vaccinated. Why?

Is my bodies immune system not good enough?
Is a vaccine that is "95% effective" (whatever that means) better than my bodies natural response?

My thoughts....

Considering that only about 12% of the population has come down with the wu-flu and of that 12% there is a 99.7% survival rate seems like the human body is well over "95% effective".

What exactly does "95٪ effective" mean anyway? They admit it doesn't keep you from getting covid. They admit that it doesn't prevent you from infecting others. What exactly is it "effectively" doing that my body cannot do on its own?

There seems to be no logic behind it.

They admit that they don't know if you can infect others or not. Not that you can, they don't know.

I've read stuff that says if you already have antibodies it's not a good idea. Look for research. If you do decide to get it, just do 1 shot. Lots of articles on that.

[SanDiego619]

The real answer is so that the pharmaceutical companies can make money and to help set the precedent that the government can coerce you into taking experimental injections for a boogeyman virus with a 99.97% survival rate. It's conditioning. Same with masks.