WSJ says Biden plans to release all available shots for first doses. If the treatment is 2 shots 3-4 weeks apart is that not medically ill advised? Like skipping a rabies shot?
Unconfigured Ad Widget
Collapse
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Delayed 2nd dose
Collapse
X
-
Delayed 2nd dose
#NotMyPresident
#ArrestFauci
sigpicTags: None -
I read that other countries are using that tactic. The thinking is that it's better to have 100 million people with 60% immunity than 50 million with 95%. And maybe the illness is less deadly in those with only one dose?-- 09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0Comment
-
-
You do KNOW that biden IS clueless ?
Psalm 1Comment
-
That potato isn't deciding anything, it's all done for him.
"Yeah, like... well, I just want to slap a hippie or two. Maybe even make them get jobs."

Comment
-
Both those expectations seem reasonably grounded in vaccinology, but the two main vaccines are of a type never before tried. I've seen vaccination data where the longer the interval between 1st and 2nd shots the better the response. Given how mild the disease is for most people, having at least some priming from the first shot might well produce an even more resistant population. Some pre-existing resistance in some people is also one theory about why the virus seems to wholly or mostly pass many people by.Comment
-
He's got to make it look that he is doing something. I believe Fauci has said that he opposes such a move.
Mojave Lever Crew Member
"It is time for us to do what we have been doing and that time is every day. Every day it is time for us to agree that there are things and tools that are available to us to slow this thing down." - Kamala "Heels Up" HarrisComment
-
In the words of Barack, 'Don't underestimate Joe's ability to f things up"."I think we have more machinery of government than is necessary, too many parasites living on the labor of the industrious." - Thomas Jefferson, 1824
Originally posted by SAN compnerdWhen the middle east descends into complete chaos in 2-3 years due in part to the actions of this administration I'll necro post about how clueless I was.Comment
-
Getting my second dose tomorrow.sigpicComment
-
Funny, I also read that they can cut the dose in half, and it will be just as effective. Sounds about right, it's just about $$$ and control."I've seen things you people wouldn't believe. Attack ships on fire off the shoulder of Orion. I watched C-beams glitter in the dark near the Tannhauser gate. All those moments will be lost in time, like tears in rain..."
Roy BattyComment
-
What does the science say?🤨
I'm not a proponent of everyone needs a vaccine either.LetsGoBrandon
FJB
"From Hell's heart, I stab at thee; For hate's sake, I spit my last breath at thee." -Khan
"There is no reason to be alive if you can't do deadlift."-J.P.S.Comment
-
There is a decent summary of the estimated impact here. We have some small amount of trial data on Moderna and Pfizer vaccines where only one dose was delivered, as some trial participants could not or did not get the second shot. Those data suggest efficacy is still pretty good, but not as good, and we don't see evidence for it doing any harm. But it is a small dataset.
There are also some game theory papers suggesting that, at the macro level, single doses at lower protectivity have a greater impact than insisting on fixed double-dose schedules.
Personally I am wholly unsupportive of the attempts to game the recommended dosage. This treats a symptom, not the problem -- if we are having problems distributing double doses, we'll likely have the same problems with individual doses. Or perhaps worse, as now we'll have to track more patients.
From an individual perspective, you are better off getting two doses instead of one. You will likely have a better immune response, and you will be following the optimized recommendation from the best trial evidence we have.
From the perspective of the vaccine manufacturers, obviously they want to make and sell more.
I think we have common ground here. I personally plan to wait until I can be assured the option to do it right.
Even if monkeying with the dosage does have a theoretical societal benefit, the unquantified assumptions in those studies are pretty important. For one thing, we have problems enough getting people to vaccinate as it is. If we start sending the signal that we're just winging it when it comes to dosage, I don't expect confidence to improve.Riflemen Needed.
Ask me about Appleseed! Send a PM or see me in the Appleseed subforum.Comment
-
Members of congress started getting the shots around Dec 23. Several are now Covid positive after the mostly peaceful protests at the Capitol. I imagine they got the full dose of saline solution."I've seen things you people wouldn't believe. Attack ships on fire off the shoulder of Orion. I watched C-beams glitter in the dark near the Tannhauser gate. All those moments will be lost in time, like tears in rain..."
Roy BattyComment
-
Lots of possible reasons for that. Tests could be false positives. Protectivity doesn't happen immediately, and the vaccine is not thought to provide sterilizing immunity -- meaning if you get an effective dose, you can still contract the virus, it just won't result in any noticeable symptoms. Even a very low level may be enough to trigger a positive test result. Furthermore, depending on what kind of test we are talking about, the vaccine may trigger a false positive. Don't have enough information to guess which is most likely.Riflemen Needed.
Ask me about Appleseed! Send a PM or see me in the Appleseed subforum.Comment
Calguns.net Statistics
Collapse
Topics: 1,866,497
Posts: 25,144,955
Members: 357,024
Active Members: 4,390
Welcome to our newest member, Wynn52.
What's Going On
Collapse
There are currently 11729 users online. 33 members and 11696 guests.
Most users ever online was 239,041 at 10:39 PM on 02-14-2026.

Comment