Not the flu, barely even a common cold.

[SanDiego619]

We shut down the economy over this???

[californialawsucks]

That data is incorrect.

[balgor]

We shut down the economy over this???

They added a % sign when they should not have:

50-69 0.5% IFR
70+ 5.4% IFR

[SanDiego619]

They added a % sign when they should not have:

50-69 0.5% IFR
70+ 5.4% IFR

I see, so anyone under 50, the IFR is 0.02% max

[bigbossman]

I see, so anyone under 50, the IFR is 0.02% max

Who are you going to believe..... The regurgitator, or your lying eyes?

[joepamjohn]

I want to know what Duenor thinks? This is probably the first time Balgor has posted without back up. Is Duenor Ok? I’m concerned.

Asking for a friend.......

[Fastattack]

Really are you that naive. If the President had taken it seriously, read intelligence reports and mandated proper protocols, There wouldn't have been a need to shutdown.

No, just stating the reality. Let's see how your boy does.

[balgor]

I want to know what Duenor thinks? This is probably the first time Balgor has posted without back up. Is Duenor Ok? I’m concerned.

Asking for a friend.......

BC the numbers in the pic are clearly insane.

An IFR of .00054 for people over 70 is ingrown toenail territory.

Here's the original source, look Mah no % signs after the numbers.

https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/hcp/planning-scenarios.html

[Epaphroditus]

13 million positive test but likely upwards of 100 million positive but not tested really makes the per capita mortality plummet.

Herd immunity likely before the vaccine makes much headway at this rate.

[duenor]

I think that we have a bunch of guys here who really, really want to believe that it's all a nothingburger and that the ensuing response was all orchestrated by shadowy satan-worshipping pedophiles to bring down the knight for all that is good and just, Donald Trump.

The blinders are so tightly wrapped around their heads they've also covered their ears, and until someone in their nuclear family gets it bad they will keep insisting that it is not real. Anyone who dares to say otherwise is either a commie, or "in on it".

[as_rocketman]

The chart in the OP was produced by a mathematical ignoramus. It is fake news.

The latest good estimate of age-dependent IFR comes from Levin et al.:

[bigbossman]

I think that we have a bunch of guys here who really, really want to believe that it's all a nothingburger.......

And several of us think that we have a couple of guys here that really really want to be thought of as subject matter "experts", who are no more qualified than a lamp post to be thought of as such.

[duenor]

The chart in the OP was produced by a mathematical ignoramus. It is fake news.

The latest good estimate of age-dependent IFR comes from Levin et al.:

Do you know if there is any data regarding lingering effects post-recovery? I haven't found much. I recognize that assembling such data would be very difficult for a number of reasons.

[JonChimpo]

And several of us think that we have a couple of guys here that really really want to be thought of as subject matter "experts", who are no more qualified than a lamp post to be thought of as such.

Hahaha! You win today.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[SanDiego619]

The chart in the OP was produced by a mathematical ignoramus. It is fake news.

The latest good estimate of age-dependent IFR comes from Levin et al.:

The ignore-anus shouldn't have put the percent signs that's all.