Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

House Relief Passes Bill

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • #16
    five.five-six
    CGN Contributor
    • May 2006
    • 34806

    Originally posted by Anonymous_Ghost
    You can bet there is something for Mitch, his wife, and their friends and cronies as well. This bill is taking it in all holes as everyone is trying to get in on this gang-bang.

    Comment

    • #17
      SAN compnerd
      CGN/CGSSA Contributor
      CGN Contributor
      • May 2009
      • 4725

      Originally posted by rklapper
      he should have closed it entirely. his order only temporarily barred entry by foreign nationals who had traveled in China within the previous 14 days, with exceptions for the immediate family of U.S. citizens and permanent residents. Americans returning from China were allowed back after enhanced screening at select ports of entry and for 14 days afterward
      Right. So when the WHO was telling people in mid January that this was not human transmissable, Trump should have cut off China then?

      Or maybe right after China shared the genome on January 9th?

      Perhaps he should have reacted to the WHO's criticism of banning travel from China for being xenophobic by banning all global travel immediately?

      Maybe after Cuomo encouraged New Yorkers to ignore the virus in early February?

      Around the same time that several major news outlets said this is nothing to worry about?


      Just trying to gage when POTUS should have second guessed himself in light of all the solid information he was presented with from global experts and the media.
      "I think we have more machinery of government than is necessary, too many parasites living on the labor of the industrious." - Thomas Jefferson, 1824

      Originally posted by SAN compnerd
      When the middle east descends into complete chaos in 2-3 years due in part to the actions of this administration I'll necro post about how clueless I was.

      Comment

      • #18
        rklapper
        Member
        • Jun 2013
        • 151

        Originally posted by SAN compnerd
        Right. So when the WHO was telling people in mid January that this was not human transmissable, Trump should have cut off China then?

        Or maybe right after China shared the genome on January 9th?

        Perhaps he should have reacted to the WHO's criticism of banning travel from China for being xenophobic by banning all global travel immediately?

        Maybe after Cuomo encouraged New Yorkers to ignore the virus in early February?

        Around the same time that several major news outlets said this is nothing to worry about?


        Just trying to gage when POTUS should have second guessed himself in light of all the solid information he was presented with from global experts and the media.
        i imagine he should have done it about the same time several major airlines were cutting off flights prior to Jan 31. after all, the State Department had already told people not to travel there. the WHO has already proved to be incompetent

        Comment

        • #19
          rklapper
          Member
          • Jun 2013
          • 151

          you can quarantine them

          Comment

          • #20
            POLICESTATE
            I need a LIFE!!
            • Apr 2009
            • 18185

            -POLICESTATE,
            In the name of the State, and of the School, and of the Infallible Science


            sigpic


            Government Official Lies
            . F r e e d o m . D i e s .

            Comment

            • #21
              five.five-six
              CGN Contributor
              • May 2006
              • 34806

              Originally posted by rklapper
              you can quarantine them

              Comment

              • #22
                rklapper
                Member
                • Jun 2013
                • 151

                some, but not all. the vast majority were self-quarantined. but no response is perfect i submit

                Comment

                • #23
                  saxman
                  Senior Member
                  • Dec 2007
                  • 555

                  Originally posted by five.five-six
                  But this bill is $6T.

                  While I don't doubt there's a lot of pork in this bill, it's $2T, not $6T.

                  Comment

                  • #24
                    five.five-six
                    CGN Contributor
                    • May 2006
                    • 34806

                    Originally posted by Anonymous_Ghost

                    Comment

                    • #25
                      five.five-six
                      CGN Contributor
                      • May 2006
                      • 34806

                      Originally posted by el chivo
                      Hmm, this means we get to use up our own money. Generous of them.
                      Nope, about 8/9ths of it goes to pork

                      at $2.2t is costs each american about $7k but payout, averaging kids, adults and inelegibles about $800/ American

                      Comment

                      • #26
                        ACfixer
                        Calguns Addict
                        • Feb 2012
                        • 6053

                        Buy made in USA whenever possible.

                        Comment

                        Working...
                        UA-8071174-1