Just for fun.... covid-19 meme thread....

[freespool]

You were talking out your *** a year ago (and proven wrong) and here we are with you still too ****ing stupid to grasp basic concepts. Maybe Chitadel Turd (who for all we know is your alter ego) will drunk post trying to jump to your rescue.... again. Enjoy your transfection......... the gene pool needs more chlorine

I notice you have nothing to say on the topic. Why did you ask the question if you don't know the topic?

You think you'd know better than by now than to sneak in where you can't hang. Do you comment on other topics you have no qualifications for?

[finsfan21]

So, I have been watching this back and forth and I'm honestly a little confused.
It seems one side thinks the study is bunk because they did not isolate for vaccination status. If I understand the logic, this could mean that the teens swaying the clotting, heart failure, and liver failure results were all vaccinated and that is the link to the increased risk. (I happen to agree but I am willing to listen)
I believe we then have freespool refuting that but also not willing to point out why he thinks the study doesn't do that.
Do I have this right?

[tladues]

+1 vote for dumbest CalGuns thread, real top brass communication going on here.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

[freespool]

So, I have been watching this back and forth and I'm honestly a little confused.
It seems one side thinks the study is bunk because they did not isolate for vaccination status. If I understand the logic, this could mean that the teens swaying the clotting, heart failure, and liver failure results were all vaccinated and that is the link to the increased risk. (I happen to agree but I am willing to listen)
I believe we then have freespool refuting that but also not willing to point out why he thinks the study doesn't do that.
Do I have this right?

The study had nothing to do with vaccinating clinical trial control subjects, as the OP implied. Or clinical trials at all. The authors explain they didn't have good vaccination status data. Much of the study happened before vaccines were available, esp to the young study group. They stratified by age (2-4, 5-11, 12-17 - whole lotta vaccination happenin in those first two groups, eh?) and got similar results in each grouping.

But, yeah, no doubt hiding vaccination status was nefarious because it would have changed the whole outcome. Good thing there's an army of ace sleuths, steeped in the minutiae of Covid science, to ferret this stuff out. Where would we be without them?

All that information was available to anyone who cared to do even the slightest bit of inspection. Took 5 minutes to find out.

My first comment was just to (politely?) point out the study indicated in the image had no bearing on the poster's personal comments.

The rest is history.

[finsfan21]

The study had nothing to do with vaccinating clinical trial control subjects, as the OP implied. Or clinical trials at all. The authors explain they didn't have good vaccination status data. Much of the study happened before vaccines were available, esp to the young study group. They stratified by age (2-4, 5-11, 12-17 - whole lotta vaccination happenin in those first two groups, eh?) and got similar results in each grouping.

But, yeah, no doubt hiding vaccination status was nefarious because it would have changed the whole outcome. Good thing there's an army of ace sleuths, steeped in the minutiae of Covid science, to ferret this stuff out. Where would we be without them?

All that information was available to anyone who cared to do even the slightest bit of inspection. Took 5 minutes to find out.

My first comment was just to (politely?) point out the study indicated in the image had no bearing on the poster's personal comments.

The rest is history.

Appreciate you clarifying your position.

[LBDamned]

This thread has gone to chit.

Why to go spoilers

[Baxter]

Where are the pictures?

[alpha_romeo_XV]

Like buying a Playboy mag back in the day to read the articles - no just no. Show me the memes.

[sigfan91]

Like buying a Playboy mag back in the day to read the articles - no just no. Show me the memes.

But please make sure the memes cite correct data and use factual charts.

[freespool]

But please make sure the memes cite correct data and use factual charts.

Make a meme to begin with, as first step.

[Eat Dirt]

This thread has gone to chit.

Agreed. I'm out

[stix213]

And back to the regularly scheduled program....

[freespool]

[freespool]

[CamW]