Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

Benelli M1 Super 90

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • #16
    Hunter
    CGN/CGSSA Contributor - Lifetime
    CGN Contributor - Lifetime
    • Mar 2006
    • 1759

    Originally posted by gose
    Was the pistolgrip ever an issue? I thought it was only folders and mag extensions?
    Ok,
    I looked up what 18 USC considers banned from importation and it states any of the semi-auto assault weapons of which includes :
    a semiautomatic shotgun that has at least 2 of --
    (i) a folding or telescoping stock;
    (ii) a pistol grip that protrudes conspicuously beneath the action of
    the weapon;
    (iii) a fixed magazine capacity in excess of 5 rounds; and
    (iv) an ability to accept a detachable magazine.
    So it seems it is a combination of the items still.
    Last edited by Hunter; 06-21-2006, 12:00 PM.

    Comment

    • #17
      gose
      Veteran Member
      • Oct 2005
      • 3953

      Originally posted by Hunter
      Ok,
      I found the recent ATF letter (see link). Now while reading this letter (which is directed at the M1014/M4 ) it appears that the ATF counts a total of 11 banned parts that include the magazine follower, buttstock and pistolgrip. So putting on an aftermarket US made follower (cheap) or buttstock or folder and pistol grip would allow you to have more than 5 rnds since it only would have 10 or less banned parts. Thus it will no longer fall under the 922(r) ruling. Californina laws would still need to be followed for folders/pistol grips.

      Now the question: Does the ATF view the M1 shotgun in the same light as the M1014/M4 shotgun? I ask as the M1 is a sporting shotgun that is available in a tactical model. Where the M1014 is only a tactical shotgun from the go. Another question for the ATF branch.

      http://www.ar15.com/forums/topic.html?b=6&f=1&t=200567
      Wow, that second letter was news to me... So you only need to replace one part to be in compliance. Hammers, magazine bodies, followers or triggers shouldn't take too much effort to produce in the US. Interesting, I think I might have to get a M4 after all...
      With Oden on our side.

      Comment

      • #18
        Hunter
        CGN/CGSSA Contributor - Lifetime
        CGN Contributor - Lifetime
        • Mar 2006
        • 1759

        Originally posted by gose
        Wow, that second letter was news to me... So you only need to replace one part to be in compliance. Hammers, magazine bodies, followers or triggers shouldn't take too much effort to produce in the US. Interesting, I think I might have to get a M4 after all...

        I would think any 12 ga follower (Rem 870, ect) would work and that is all that would be needed.

        Comment

        • #19
          gose
          Veteran Member
          • Oct 2005
          • 3953

          Originally posted by Technical Ted
          Surefire fore end and a high visibility shell follower and you're under 10.

          Don't see why it shouldn't apply to the M1 S 90 Tactical as well.
          Hmm, does 'no more than 10' mean <= 10 or < 10?
          With Oden on our side.

          Comment

          Working...
          UA-8071174-1