Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

California Long Gun Gifting

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Beachman66
    Junior Member
    • Feb 2013
    • 3

    California Long Gun Gifting

    I live in New York State and going to visit my sister & brother-in-law in
    San Francisco. They want to "give" me 2 shotguns they no longer want.
    My intent is to take possession and then ship via UPS to a FFL dealer
    in New York State to complete the transfer. What is the "process" and
    paperwork I have to follow in California to accomplish this?
  • #2
    Chaos47
    Calguns Addict
    • Apr 2010
    • 6615

    Sister and brother-in-law do not count as an interfamily transfer in CA.
    Only up and down, Dad to Child, Child to Dad, Grandpa to Grandchild etc. So this would need an FFL.
    Second you are out of state which would also require an FFL.

    You need to both go to an FFL here in CA do paperwork and have them ship it to your FFL in NY.

    Comment

    • #3
      Beachman66
      Junior Member
      • Feb 2013
      • 3

      If I don't take possession of the guns in California...can my sister ship the long guns herself to my FFL in New York State, without her going through an FFL in California?

      Comment

      • #4
        chillincody
        Veteran Member
        • Aug 2011
        • 2675

        Originally posted by Beachman66
        If I don't take possession of the guns in California...can my sister ship the long guns herself to my FFL in New York State, without her going through an FFL in California?
        some FFLs dont take shipments of guns from non FFLs so you would have to find a dealer in NY that would be willing to take the shipment from your sis (non FFL)

        far as having to come to a CA FFLI dont see why you would since your a NY resident but maybe chaos will explain if im wrong
        Laws that forbid the carrying of arms... disarm only those who are neither inclined nor determined to commit crimes... Such laws make things worse for the assaulted and better for the assailants; they serve rather to encourage than to prevent homicides, for an unarmed man may be attacked with greater confidence than an armed man. Jefferson's "Commonplace Book," 1774_1776, quoting from On Crimes and Punishment, by criminologist Cesare Beccaria, 1764

        Comment

        • #5
          Chaos47
          Calguns Addict
          • Apr 2010
          • 6615

          He stated he was coming to CA to get them and he wanted to "take possession and then ship".
          Taking possession of them at that point would be an illegal transfer.
          He can not take possession of them from his sister without an FFL for the 2 reasons I listed.

          He can go to the FFL with his sister and have the transfer started and shipped to his FFL.
          Or his sister can go to an FFL and have it sent to his FFL.
          Or if his FFL will take a shipment from a Non-FFL then his sister can ship it to his FFL.

          Comment

          • #6
            chillincody
            Veteran Member
            • Aug 2011
            • 2675

            Originally posted by Chaos47
            He stated he was coming to CA to get them and he wanted to "take possession and then ship".
            Taking possession of them at that point would be an illegal transfer.
            He can not take possession of them from his sister without an FFL for the 2 reasons I listed.

            He can go to the FFL with his sister and have the transfer started and shipped to his FFL.
            Or his sister can go to an FFL and have it sent to his FFL.
            Or if his FFL will take a shipment from a Non-FFL then his sister can ship it to his FFL.
            Ok that makes sense
            Laws that forbid the carrying of arms... disarm only those who are neither inclined nor determined to commit crimes... Such laws make things worse for the assaulted and better for the assailants; they serve rather to encourage than to prevent homicides, for an unarmed man may be attacked with greater confidence than an armed man. Jefferson's "Commonplace Book," 1774_1776, quoting from On Crimes and Punishment, by criminologist Cesare Beccaria, 1764

            Comment

            • #7
              Beachman66
              Junior Member
              • Feb 2013
              • 3

              Thanks much for the answers...very helpful

              Comment

              • #8
                bigbully
                Senior Member
                • Feb 2008
                • 1904

                I thought only handguns required FFL to FFL transfer. Couldn't his sister just ship the long guns directly to the FFL herself? (Assuming the NY FFL will accept from private party.)

                Comment

                • #9
                  Quiet
                  retired Goon
                  • Mar 2007
                  • 30242

                  Originally posted by bigbully
                  I thought only handguns required FFL to FFL transfer. Couldn't his sister just ship the long guns directly to the FFL herself? (Assuming the NY FFL will accept from private party.)
                  There are no Federal or state laws that mandate FFL to FFL shipping only.

                  Therefore, it is up to the individual FFL to determine if they will accept a shipment from a non-FFL or from FFLs only.
                  sigpic

                  "If someone has a gun and is trying to kill you, it would be reasonable to shoot back with your own gun." - Dalai Lama (Seattle Times, 05-15-2001).

                  Comment

                  • #10
                    bigbully
                    Senior Member
                    • Feb 2008
                    • 1904

                    Ah. I see now I was just confusing it with the restrictions that USPS has. Common and contract carriers are ok to ship handguns.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    UA-8071174-1