Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

M2 or M4 ? Recoil

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • 1911man
    Senior Member
    • Jun 2006
    • 1575

    M2 or M4 ? Recoil

    One is gas the other is recoil operated, which one in your opinion would have less felt recoil. Thanks guys.
  • #2
    smittty
    Calguns Addict
    • Feb 2008
    • 6260

    M4 has less recoil but it's heavy. Most people I know that have tried both prefer the M2.

    Comment

    • #3
      1911man
      Senior Member
      • Jun 2006
      • 1575

      Benelli

      Thanks.

      Comment

      • #4
        Saym14
        Calguns Addict
        • Jul 2009
        • 7892

        I prefer the m4. It's more reliable

        Comment

        • #5
          PEBKAC
          Senior Member
          • Nov 2008
          • 1026

          I own both. M4 does have lighter recoil given the same ammo though this makes sense given it is heavier. Neither is unpleasant to shoot by any means (unless you got one of the M2 walnut stocks with over-aggressive grip texturing, in which case your hands might hurt during and after).

          That said I prefer my M2 for most purposes, and as long as you don't brace it against a wall to fire it you won't have any reliability issues unless you start firing really light loads, which the M4 is going to have trouble with too unless you found one of the old 4-port low-recoil-loads-only barrels.
          sigpic
          Love and Peace through superior firepower.

          Originally posted by 7x57
          Plus, we can check out each other's hardware. Who says we can't find common ground?
          Originally posted by hoffmang
          Soap box, ballot box, jury box, ammo box. Use in that order.
          Originally posted by ar15barrels
          You need to grow a full beard and move out into the woods before you can be a full fledged member of the surplus rifle long range shooting community.

          Comment

          • #6
            Saym14
            Calguns Addict
            • Jul 2009
            • 7892

            Originally posted by PEBKAC
            I own both. M4 does have lighter recoil given the same ammo though this makes sense given it is heavier. Neither is unpleasant to shoot by any means (unless you got one of the M2 walnut stocks with over-aggressive grip texturing, in which case your hands might hurt during and after).

            That said I prefer my M2 for most purposes, and as long as you don't brace it against a wall to fire it you won't have any reliability issues unless you start firing really light loads, which the M4 is going to have trouble with too unless you found one of the old 4-port low-recoil-loads-only barrels.
            Isn't it the opposite? If you do not shoulder it firmly it may not cycle. Also if you add she'll carriers etc it may not cycle.

            Comment

            • #7
              TempleKnight
              Senior Member
              • Aug 2009
              • 918

              Originally posted by Saym14
              Isn't it the opposite? If you do not shoulder it firmly it may not cycle. Also if you add she'll carriers etc it may not cycle.
              The most common Benelli shotgun in 3gun competition is the M2. It's reliable enough for people shooting for money.

              I've never had a problem with mine cycling. I have an 8 rd side saddle plus a 2 pack mounted on the gun. Zero issues.

              Get an M4 if you are breaching a lot of doors.

              With regard to recoil; one of the best 3gunners on the Benelli team is a 17 year old girl, Katy Harris. She's one of shooters featured in this video
              sigpic

              Comment

              • #8
                Saym14
                Calguns Addict
                • Jul 2009
                • 7892

                the M2 is a great gun and yes its way more popular. but I personally know people who have had failures to function due to 1) not soilidly shouldering the weapon, 2) adding wieght by adding accessories.

                like I said the M2 is an excellent gun, and as you said a winner in 3gun. but I would rather trust my life to an M4.

                Comment

                • #9
                  Bobby Hated
                  Senior Member
                  • Oct 2010
                  • 1616

                  M2 all day.

                  katy harris smoked me at mg nationals. shes no joke man!
                  USPSA Master TY-71084

                  Comment

                  • #10
                    G-Solutions
                    Senior Member
                    • Mar 2010
                    • 672

                    I fired both, but the M4 was quite awhile ago and It did not feel that much different. I own an M2 and due to its light weight, it;s a highly maneuverable weapon.

                    Standard loads are no problem - light recoil loads can lead to FTE's. Normally, I'd prefer a carbine, but in the shotgun niche, I give the M2 two thumbs up.
                    Upcoming Classes:
                    Martial Blade Concepts Seminar with Michael Janich
                    March 16-17, 2024 - Anaheim, CA
                    www.gebhardsolutions.com

                    Comment

                    • #11
                      PEBKAC
                      Senior Member
                      • Nov 2008
                      • 1026

                      Originally posted by Saym14
                      Isn't it the opposite? If you do not shoulder it firmly it may not cycle. Also if you add she'll carriers etc it may not cycle.
                      I was under the impression that part of the reason the M2 cycled is because one moves just slightly when the gun recoils into your shoulder, and that when you brace it against a wall and fire system doesn't move enough, and thus won't cycle.

                      I could be wrong.
                      sigpic
                      Love and Peace through superior firepower.

                      Originally posted by 7x57
                      Plus, we can check out each other's hardware. Who says we can't find common ground?
                      Originally posted by hoffmang
                      Soap box, ballot box, jury box, ammo box. Use in that order.
                      Originally posted by ar15barrels
                      You need to grow a full beard and move out into the woods before you can be a full fledged member of the surplus rifle long range shooting community.

                      Comment

                      • #12
                        teflondog
                        Veteran Member
                        • Jun 2009
                        • 4011

                        I found the M4 to have noticeably less recoil than the M2 when firing OO buckshot. Birdshot felt the same to me.
                        Originally posted by G. Michael Hopf
                        Hard times create strong men, strong men create good times, good times create weak men, and weak men create hard times.

                        Comment

                        • #13
                          Sumo99
                          Senior Member
                          • Jan 2008
                          • 781

                          Originally posted by PEBKAC
                          I was under the impression that part of the reason the M2 cycled is because one moves just slightly when the gun recoils into your shoulder, and that when you brace it against a wall and fire system doesn't move enough, and thus won't cycle.

                          I could be wrong.
                          That's my understanding as well.

                          Comment

                          • #14
                            kentactic
                            Senior Member
                            • Sep 2012
                            • 1127

                            Originally posted by PEBKAC
                            I was under the impression that part of the reason the M2 cycled is because one moves just slightly when the gun recoils into your shoulder, and that when you brace it against a wall and fire system doesn't move enough, and thus won't cycle.

                            I could be wrong.
                            I dont know much about the gun but it would seem no rearward moevment such as against a wall would allow the action to cycle most effectively. If the guns moving back WITH the action it would seem to me that would cause more issues. Similar to limp wristing a pistol.

                            Comment

                            • #15
                              PEBKAC
                              Senior Member
                              • Nov 2008
                              • 1026

                              Originally posted by kentactic
                              I dont know much about the gun but it would seem no rearward moevment such as against a wall would allow the action to cycle most effectively. If the guns moving back WITH the action it would seem to me that would cause more issues. Similar to limp wristing a pistol.
                              Your logic makes sense for most cases, but not this one. I went and found an explanation of how it works (see below).



                              Same system the Benellis use, this is probably the best explanation as it provides a cutaway unlike the one on Benelli's site though it doesn't have an animation.
                              sigpic
                              Love and Peace through superior firepower.

                              Originally posted by 7x57
                              Plus, we can check out each other's hardware. Who says we can't find common ground?
                              Originally posted by hoffmang
                              Soap box, ballot box, jury box, ammo box. Use in that order.
                              Originally posted by ar15barrels
                              You need to grow a full beard and move out into the woods before you can be a full fledged member of the surplus rifle long range shooting community.

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              UA-8071174-1