Anyone own one of these. It says it should shoot low base shells. My friend wants to get one if he can use it for Duck and Dove. Should he get the 3" or 3 1/2"? Any complaints about this gun. Pricy gun, that's why he's got me asking around before he dives in. Thanks Pat
Unconfigured Ad Widget
Collapse
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Browning Maxus
Collapse
X
-
Browning Maxus
Tags: None -
Read the American Rifleman review and they loved it, they said it no problem with the lighest target loads all the way up to the heaviest magnums.Name: Dobalina, Mr.Bob Dobalina
Originally posted by kielbasavwThere's a reason why the feds stopped using the 10mm it went right through the enemy every time, so they moved to the .40.Originally posted by walterI was at Calguns before you -
Oh yeah he might as well get the 3 1/2 for the versatilityName: Dobalina, Mr.Bob Dobalina
Originally posted by kielbasavwThere's a reason why the feds stopped using the 10mm it went right through the enemy every time, so they moved to the .40.Originally posted by walterI was at Calguns before youComment
-
It's supposed to be the next in line after the Gold and uses the same technology. My 3" gold hunter can fire anything from the light 7/8 oz target loads up to lead, steel, and tungsten magnums without a problem. The only complaint I have about the new gun is the inability to extend the mag tube since the forend stock seems to cover the magazine and I think unplugged, it only holds 4 shells, which is plenty for hunting since you need 2+1, but for competition, 4 is practically useless.
It looks to be pretty sweet.Last edited by sargenv; 04-29-2010, 2:07 PM.Comment
Calguns.net Statistics
Collapse
Topics: 1,868,504
Posts: 25,171,450
Members: 357,642
Active Members: 5,354
Welcome to our newest member, Lvnfreenez_62.
What's Going On
Collapse
There are currently 15541 users online. 157 members and 15384 guests.
Most users ever online was 239,041 at 10:39 PM on 02-14-2026.

Comment