Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

Benelli M1 Super 90 or M2?

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Wildhawk66
    CGN/CGSSA Contributor - Lifetime
    CGN Contributor - Lifetime
    • Mar 2006
    • 3608

    Benelli M1 Super 90 or M2?

    I'm considering buying a Benelli shotgun and was wondering if anyone has shot both the M1 Super 90 and the M2? If so, I would much appreciate a comparison or any thoughts you might have on these shotguns. The M1 is about $300 cheaper these days, but doesn't have a few of the features such as cryo tube, that the M2 does. Are those features really worth the extra money? As for use, I plan on using it primarily for sporting clays and trap, with an occasion pheasant hunt, etc. Thanks in advance.
  • #2
    vikingshelmut
    Member
    • Oct 2006
    • 280

    Howdy Wildhawk66! You survive your Super Chavellas today? Let me know if you ever find anyone who has one, and/or if you ever get to shoot one. I'd be interested in knowing how well that Comfortech stock works. My shoulder is still hurting from today. What can I say, I'm a wuss.

    Comment

    • #3
      Ironballs
      Member
      • Oct 2005
      • 488

      M2 has option to have comfortech, and option to have cryo tubes (which are longer than normal chokes). I belive a base M2 (no comfortech, no choke tubes) is about 250ish more than M1, than add for comfortech and add for choke. For hunting, the tubes would be a nice touch. Comfortech on the otherhand, is full of mixed reviews. Saw one on THR where a guy tried them both and found no diff, saw a review on SGW (below) where the guy says it works great. Most testing that is not sxs say it offers nothing.

      I shot a Benelli Sport II with wood stock next to a Supersport with Synthetic (Comfortech) stock today. Same gun in every way accept the stock. I switched back and forth with the same 1 oz loads. Then 1 1/8 loads. Repeated this again. Definitive difference. The seemingly silly synthetic...


      For tactical... M1 imo- spend the rest on shells... (personally I'll take an 11-87P for my semi,...)
      PRK -----> Henderson - Las Vegas area.
      Not a single regret!

      Comment

      • #4
        robairto
        Senior Member
        • Nov 2006
        • 772

        My take is

        I have a m1 26" in satin black that is about 7 years old. It has funtioned flawlessly throughout with 3" magnums while duck hunting. I've
        completely submerged the gun a couple of times on accident. It runs
        like a timex and fits my small stubby hands. Iv'e never noticed any
        issues with the gun when firing it and it shoulders quite nicely with
        no more recoil then the other guns I use. I can't say anything about
        the new chokes/comfort tech other than I will skip it when I buy
        a new one. The rubber pads on the comforthech don't shoulder and
        lockin like I prefer. That's my .02. RB
        "I'm no school boy, I know what I like "
        SACTO area

        Comment

        • #5
          vikingshelmut
          Member
          • Oct 2006
          • 280

          How light of a load can you use? I'm interested in doing some sporting clays on a regular basis, and shooting 100+ rounds can take it's toll on a guys shoulder. The lighter the load I can use the better. I've heard other "inertia" based semi-autos have problems with the lighter loads, so I'm curious if it is the same with the M1.

          Comment

          • #6
            anotherone
            Senior Member
            • Jun 2006
            • 972

            Just get the M-1. Personally I use a Benelli Super Nova but then again I'm hunting some pretty brutal rice fields where the gun must be able to survive being buried in mud and submerged in water.

            Comment

            • #7
              randy
              In Memoriam
              • Nov 2006
              • 4642

              I can't tell a big difference in recoil between the two, but I shoot trap loads and lo recoil slugs. Perhaps if you shot heavy game loads the difference in the stocks would become more noticable.

              I'd save the $300 and get the M1
              I move slow but I make up for it by shooting poorly.

              When I hit the lotto I'm only shooting factory.

              Comment

              • #8
                vikingshelmut
                Member
                • Oct 2006
                • 280

                Originally posted by randy
                I can't tell a big difference in recoil between the two, but I shoot trap loads and lo recoil slugs. Perhaps if you shot heavy game loads the difference in the stocks would become more noticable.

                I'd save the $300 and get the M1
                Randy, what size trap loads do you shoot through your M1?

                Comment

                • #9
                  randy
                  In Memoriam
                  • Nov 2006
                  • 4642

                  1oz. 3 dram 7.5 or 8

                  1 1/8th os 2 3/4 or 3 dram 7.5 or 8

                  I try to buy estate shells and winchester ranger 1oz lo recoil slugs
                  I move slow but I make up for it by shooting poorly.

                  When I hit the lotto I'm only shooting factory.

                  Comment

                  • #10
                    randy
                    In Memoriam
                    • Nov 2006
                    • 4642

                    I have shot lots of winchester AA all different loads but it's just a bit spendy and I the Estate runs great. I don't shoot Trap I use it for 3 gun
                    I move slow but I make up for it by shooting poorly.

                    When I hit the lotto I'm only shooting factory.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    UA-8071174-1