delete
Unconfigured Ad Widget
Collapse
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N/A
Collapse
X
-
If it's a magnum receiver, get a remchoke barrel that is chambered for 2 3/4" & 3".
If it's not a magnum receiver, get a remchoke barrel that is chambered for 2 3/4".God Bless America - My iTrader rating - https://www.calguns.net/forum/market...2-transactions -
I did this almost 15 years ago on my wingmaster magnum. Replaced the fixed barrel with a Remington remchoke barrel and haven't had a single issue. Back then it was about $150. No idea what they are now.Comment
-
Any remchoke barrel is proofed for steel. Replacing the barrel will be cheaper than a new shotgun.NRA-ILA Lawmaker Contact Tool
A Fistful of Dollars
Originally posted by BKinzeyThe chuckleheaded tinfoil-asshatter racist (yes! that's a couple of names and a label!)Comment
-
Zak --=--
Just be sure to that new barrel has the same finish as the Wingmaster high gloss finish. Most on the current market are the Matte finish 870 Express that seems to have some corrosion issues if not taken care of properly. Plus it won't match the receiver if it's for an Express model.Comment
-
It's a 1955 gun, so almost certainly not a 3" mag receiver. The problem with putting a 3" barrel on a 2-3/4" gun is that some yahoo down the road will see the 3" chamber marking and try to use 3" loads in it. Not prudent. Used barrels with 2-3/4" chamber are everywhere, and are generally cheaper than the 3" barrels. And safer on that receiver.
Why has no one mentioned the fit difference between the standard (1955) barrel and the later "light contour barrel." The light contour barrel will work, but the forend gap will be larger, and objectionable to anyone who is serious about 870s.
Another option is to just have the choke opened on the current barrel. Or to fit screw chokes to the current barrel. Not that expensive. OP can call Bob Day at AmeriChoke in Pico Rivera for pricing. There is probably a smith in San Diego who can do the work, but Bob is the go-to guy for most of us.Comment
-
I'd largely echo this. Where I might part is that I know several who've put 3" barrels on non-magnum receivers and shot 3" successfully.It's a 1955 gun, so almost certainly not a 3" mag receiver. The problem with putting a 3" barrel on a 2-3/4" gun is that some yahoo down the road will see the 3" chamber marking and try to use 3" loads in it. Not prudent. Used barrels with 2-3/4" chamber are everywhere, and are generally cheaper than the 3" barrels. And safer on that receiver.
Why has no one mentioned the fit difference between the standard (1955) barrel and the later "light contour barrel." The light contour barrel will work, but the forend gap will be larger, and objectionable to anyone who is serious about 870s.
Another option is to just have the choke opened on the current barrel. Or to fit screw chokes to the current barrel. Not that expensive. OP can call Bob Day at AmeriChoke in Pico Rivera for pricing. There is probably a smith in San Diego who can do the work, but Bob is the go-to guy for most of us.
I've turned several "closet queens" into shooters by having screw-in chokes installed (Factory chokes way too tight in today's world). I haven't "converted" anything into 3", though I do know it gets done on O/U's as do 2-9/16 into 2-3/4".Palestine is a fake country
No Mas Hamas
#BlackolivesmatterComment
-
Yes it's 2-3/4". I'm wondering if it's problematic to shoot steel out of an old barrel due solely to the fixed full choke, or are there other issues with an old barrel. If it's just a choke issue, then getting my current barrel modified at AmeriChoke sounds like a great idea.It's a 1955 gun, so almost certainly not a 3" mag receiver. The problem with putting a 3" barrel on a 2-3/4" gun is that some yahoo down the road will see the 3" chamber marking and try to use 3" loads in it. Not prudent. Used barrels with 2-3/4" chamber are everywhere, and are generally cheaper than the 3" barrels. And safer on that receiver.
Why has no one mentioned the fit difference between the standard (1955) barrel and the later "light contour barrel." The light contour barrel will work, but the forend gap will be larger, and objectionable to anyone who is serious about 870s.
Another option is to just have the choke opened on the current barrel. Or to fit screw chokes to the current barrel. Not that expensive. OP can call Bob Day at AmeriChoke in Pico Rivera for pricing. There is probably a smith in San Diego who can do the work, but Bob is the go-to guy for most of us.
12ga, not sure about the frame though
You're right, almost all the barrels I'm seeing have a matte finish. I did some research and it looks like it'll interchange just fine, probably won't look as pretty thoughZak --=--
Just be sure to that new barrel has the same finish as the Wingmaster high gloss finish. Most on the current market are the Matte finish 870 Express that seems to have some corrosion issues if not taken care of properly. Plus it won't match the receiver if it's for an Express model.
Comment
-
With some guns (mostly English and Spanish light game guns) it is both a choke and barrel wall thickness issue, but seldom a steel issue (unless it's a Damascus or other hammer welded barrel). The steel in the old Rem barrel is fine, so your problem is the full choke for steel. If you like the way the barrel performs for you with FC and lead shot, then a Mod choking with normal steel bird loads will perform about the same as the old combo. Bob can measure your barrel wall thickness and let you know if there are any issues before he does any other work. Screw chokes would make the gun more versatile for the long term.I'm wondering if it's problematic to shoot steel out of an old barrel due solely to the fixed full choke, or are there other issues with an old barrel. If it's just a choke issueComment
-
Another option would be to buy a used barrel with a fixed IC choke.
That's what I did for my Remington 11-48 and Beretta AL-2.
But if I were you I would look for a barrel with Rem chokes as others have suggested.
.Last edited by Huntsprig; 07-18-2019, 3:33 PM.
"I think our governments will remain virtuous for many centuries; as long as they are chiefly agricultural; and this will be as long as there shall be vacant lands in any part of America. When they get piled upon one another in large cities, as in Europe, they will become corrupt as in Europe."
Thomas JeffersonComment
Calguns.net Statistics
Collapse
Topics: 1,864,445
Posts: 25,119,456
Members: 355,945
Active Members: 4,494
Welcome to our newest member, glocksource.
What's Going On
Collapse
There are currently 3972 users online. 120 members and 3852 guests.
Most users ever online was 239,041 at 10:39 PM on 02-14-2026.


Comment