Over the last few months I've accumulated most of the parts for a 10/22 pattern rifle in .22 LR. I would be using this proposed rifle for informal target shooting from 50 to 100 yards. I like to tinker, so I'm piecing it together myself.
So far I have an 18" Shaw 0.920" OD spiral fluted stainless (unthreaded) barrel, a Volquartsen 2000 trigger assembly, a Bell & Carlson Anschutz style stock, and a few other small parts, including a Volquartsen bolt tune up kit. I'm looking for a receiver and a bolt to finish it up.
I'm somewhere between cheap and extravagant. I cobbled together another 10/22 with a 20" Green Mountain 0.920 OD fluted stainless barrel, a Timney trigger assembly, and a B & C target/varmint style stock, and I'm pretty happy with the accuracy and performance of that rifle. I used a Ruger stainless carbine for the stock and bolt. It cost about $1,100 by the time I bought some spare mags, and it shoots five shot groups measuring about 0.7" at 50 yards and about 1.4" at one hundred yards, indoors, with good ammo.
I'm trying to figure out what to do about the receiver and bolt for this next rifle. The Volquartsen receiver is pretty pricey and I've kind of ruled it out. The KIDD receiver and bolt would run about $400, and I'm thinking about that one.
Would the KIDD receiver and bolt pay any dividends in accuracy over just waiting for the next Turner's sale on stainless 10/22's? The last one I bought polished up pretty nicely. A few hours in the shop and the bearing surfaces of the bolt and the inside of the receiver got slick and smooth, but there are a lot of KIDD fans out there, and I am wondering what the real world advantage might be to using that receiver and bolt.
I read up on Rimfire Central, but it was hard to get any opinions specific to the accuracy level expected from different options. A lot of folks raved about the "build quality" and "fitment" of the KIDD products, but I am concerned with the accuracy expected from a rifle with a KIDD receiver and bolt versus a polished up Ruger receiver and bolt.
What should I do? What should I do?
So far I have an 18" Shaw 0.920" OD spiral fluted stainless (unthreaded) barrel, a Volquartsen 2000 trigger assembly, a Bell & Carlson Anschutz style stock, and a few other small parts, including a Volquartsen bolt tune up kit. I'm looking for a receiver and a bolt to finish it up.
I'm somewhere between cheap and extravagant. I cobbled together another 10/22 with a 20" Green Mountain 0.920 OD fluted stainless barrel, a Timney trigger assembly, and a B & C target/varmint style stock, and I'm pretty happy with the accuracy and performance of that rifle. I used a Ruger stainless carbine for the stock and bolt. It cost about $1,100 by the time I bought some spare mags, and it shoots five shot groups measuring about 0.7" at 50 yards and about 1.4" at one hundred yards, indoors, with good ammo.
I'm trying to figure out what to do about the receiver and bolt for this next rifle. The Volquartsen receiver is pretty pricey and I've kind of ruled it out. The KIDD receiver and bolt would run about $400, and I'm thinking about that one.
Would the KIDD receiver and bolt pay any dividends in accuracy over just waiting for the next Turner's sale on stainless 10/22's? The last one I bought polished up pretty nicely. A few hours in the shop and the bearing surfaces of the bolt and the inside of the receiver got slick and smooth, but there are a lot of KIDD fans out there, and I am wondering what the real world advantage might be to using that receiver and bolt.
I read up on Rimfire Central, but it was hard to get any opinions specific to the accuracy level expected from different options. A lot of folks raved about the "build quality" and "fitment" of the KIDD products, but I am concerned with the accuracy expected from a rifle with a KIDD receiver and bolt versus a polished up Ruger receiver and bolt.
What should I do? What should I do?



).
Comment