Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

.22lr upper receiver

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • vince1015
    Member
    • May 2013
    • 115

    .22lr upper receiver

    Hey everyone, I am having trouble with something and I thought id ask you guys. A while back I convinced my wife to let me get another gun. I decided that I wanted something I could really put to use at the range, and given ammo prices, a .22 sounded like my best choice. I wanted semi auto, and I really wanted to go tacti-cool because I love tinkering and customizing. Initially I was going with a 10/22 because of the glowing reviews and endless options. With the craziness happening, I switched my train of thought to building an ar-15 .22 so that I could have a lower receiver in case they were outlawed down the road, and I'd like to have the option for a bonafide .223 later on. I bought all the parts I would need, minus the upper. (I went with the polymer80 lower fyi, very exciting stuff and anyone interested in having a gun that uncle Sam can't steal from you should check out the thread in this forum)

    My question is this: why does an ar-15 .22lr upper cost twice as much as an entire 10/22, which everyone agrees is a quality rifle? I have found a Chiappa .22 upper on lanbos for $260; but even then I'm still spending as much as a whole ruger rifle. I can't seem to figure out why these uppers aren't $150 max. And god forbid I go with a cmmg, then I'm looking at $350+!

    I'm not a noob to the gun world, but I'm by no means a veteran. I own several guns, but I can't seem to justify the price difference here. Please enlighten me.

    Thanks,

    Vincent

    P.s. in case anyone is thinking of doing the same, I went with a p-tac lpk from Palmetto state, which is $40 right now, making the build minus the upper $190.
  • #2
    Chaos47
    Calguns Addict
    • Apr 2010
    • 6615

    Ruger is a big company that has made millions of 10/22's, companies that make .22LR uppers are small in comparison. Ruger has made back its R&D and cost of machinery many times over. They can also buy bigger lots of metal at better prices. Just a couple of reasons that come to mind.

    Comment

    • #3
      wavelengthsf
      Member
      • Feb 2013
      • 215

      I've heard bad things about Chiappa, and would go for a CMMG instead.

      There's a big thread here:
      http://www.calguns.net/calgunforum/s...d.php?t=799428 that talks about why a 22lr upper costs the same as a 5.56 upper (basically you have all the same parts.)

      That thread also some good deals on CMMG and other quality uppers.

      Comment

      • #4
        dyson
        Veteran Member
        • Feb 2013
        • 4342

        Its the price of that bolt, same price as a premium 223 bolt

        Comment

        • #5
          vince1015
          Member
          • May 2013
          • 115

          Okay that link is very informative. Just out of curiosity, why do you think that the chiappa .22 is a bad product? I have a friend who just purchased one and he's very pleased with it.

          Comment

          • #6
            XDRoX
            Veteran Member
            • Mar 2009
            • 4420

            Originally posted by vince1015
            Okay that link is very informative. Just out of curiosity, why do you think that the chiappa .22 is a bad product? I have a friend who just purchased one and he's very pleased with it.
            Is that the plastic one?
            Plastic lowers are one thing but a plastic upper is a bad idea IMO. It won't last.
            Chris
            <----Rimfire Addict


            Originally posted by Oceanbob
            Get a DILLON...

            Comment

            Working...
            UA-8071174-1