So I want to buy the new Ruger 22/45, with no sights, a Picatinny rail on top, an accessory Picatinny rail on the bottom, and a threaded barrel. I should be able to SSE it through a local gun shop, using a longer barrel and magazine block. My question is, will Red Loctite do for locking the thread protector onto the barrel threads and thus avoiding breaking the assault weapon law? After it gets sent to the FFL for the SSE, can they just put Loctite on the thread protector before handing it to me? I've heard that the Walther P22 went through this fiasco, and the DOJ said Loctite would do the job, but I want to know if it will work for the Ruger 22/45.
Unconfigured Ad Widget
Collapse
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ruger 22/45 Threaded Barrel
Collapse
X
-
Ruger 22/45 Threaded Barrel
Tags: None -
The Walther P22 was a DOJ "ooops" so it got special consideration.
The definition of permanent as in "permanently attached" is not in CA law.
Fed law for barrel extensions requires welding or blind pinning with a weld over the pin hole to be considered permanent.
Red loctite is not likely to be enough to satisfy CA for use on a 22/45.
Originally posted by Citadelgrad87I don't really care, I just like to argue.
Calguns.net Statistics
Collapse
Topics: 1,868,763
Posts: 25,174,905
Members: 357,644
Active Members: 5,405
Welcome to our newest member, Ty160805.
What's Going On
Collapse
There are currently 17714 users online. 129 members and 17585 guests.
Most users ever online was 239,041 at 10:39 PM on 02-14-2026.

Comment