Anyone know the major difference between the two?
Unconfigured Ad Widget
Collapse
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ruger MKIII Vs. 22/45
Collapse
X
-
Tags: None
-
Mechanically, they are basically identical. The 22/45 has a polymer grip frame with a grip angle more similar to a 1911. It also takes a different magazine, similar to the MkIII but with a larger base plate.Comment
-
LOVE my MKIII rather than the 22/45. I tried both and I like both grips, but I'm an all steel guy if I can help it. I love the weight, it has a 6 7/8" barrel with a VQ compensator adding even more muzzle weight which helps keep on target for quick follow up shots. Shooting red dot or irons, its just a tac driver!Comment
-
I recently got a MKIII hunter and absolutely love the thing. Mine came with the cocobolo wood grips which felt good, but I'm giving the Hogue brand a try at the range tomorrow.
Personally I didn't like the plastic feel of the 22/45, and although it is designed to feel like a 1911, I really don't think it does. But thats just my opinion, and I really don't know sh*t
Comment
-
The 22/45 RP models have replaceable grips. However, I don't believe any are on the CA Roster, so they are more difficult to come by.
I think there are also custom shops that will modify the 22/45 to take standard 1911 grips.Comment
Calguns.net Statistics
Collapse
Topics: 1,870,203
Posts: 25,169,249
Members: 358,862
Active Members: 5,413
Welcome to our newest member, 1776 Arms.
What's Going On
Collapse
There are currently 14911 users online. 151 members and 14760 guests.
Most users ever online was 239,041 at 11:39 PM on 02-14-2026.

Comment