Anyone know the major difference between the two?
Unconfigured Ad Widget
Collapse
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ruger MKIII Vs. 22/45
Collapse
X
-
Tags: None
-
Mechanically, they are basically identical. The 22/45 has a polymer grip frame with a grip angle more similar to a 1911. It also takes a different magazine, similar to the MkIII but with a larger base plate.Comment
-
LOVE my MKIII rather than the 22/45. I tried both and I like both grips, but I'm an all steel guy if I can help it. I love the weight, it has a 6 7/8" barrel with a VQ compensator adding even more muzzle weight which helps keep on target for quick follow up shots. Shooting red dot or irons, its just a tac driver!Comment
-
I recently got a MKIII hunter and absolutely love the thing. Mine came with the cocobolo wood grips which felt good, but I'm giving the Hogue brand a try at the range tomorrow.
Personally I didn't like the plastic feel of the 22/45, and although it is designed to feel like a 1911, I really don't think it does. But thats just my opinion, and I really don't know sh*t
Comment
-
The 22/45 RP models have replaceable grips. However, I don't believe any are on the CA Roster, so they are more difficult to come by.
I think there are also custom shops that will modify the 22/45 to take standard 1911 grips.Comment
Calguns.net Statistics
Collapse
Topics: 1,866,504
Posts: 25,145,072
Members: 357,024
Active Members: 4,390
Welcome to our newest member, Wynn52.
What's Going On
Collapse
There are currently 16211 users online. 119 members and 16092 guests.
Most users ever online was 239,041 at 10:39 PM on 02-14-2026.

Comment