Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

Legal Issues with AR-7?

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • GettoPhilosopher
    Senior Member
    • Sep 2010
    • 1814

    Legal Issues with AR-7?

    Hi,

    Quick question....does anything change legally with the AR7/Henry Survival Rifle being *disassembled* vs. assembled? Do any of the laws affect carry/transport/etc differently if it's "parts of a firearm inside a stock" vs. "an assembled firearm"?
  • #2
    Quiet
    retired Goon
    • Mar 2007
    • 30241

    Nothing changes.
    sigpic

    "If someone has a gun and is trying to kill you, it would be reasonable to shoot back with your own gun." - Dalai Lama (Seattle Times, 05-15-2001).

    Comment

    • #3
      bohoki
      I need a LIFE!!
      • Jan 2006
      • 20815

      ive often wondered if it was illegal to attach the barrel before the stock cause for a few seconds you have created a firearm from a rifle that is less than 26 oal

      Comment

      • #4
        BHP FAN
        Member
        • Dec 2008
        • 419

        isn't it just ''parts'' unless it's assembled?It cant be fired when its stowed in it's stock, so why couldn't it be stowed under the seat of a jeep, or a canoe? How can it be a concealed weapon disassembled?

        Comment

        • #5
          woodey
          Senior Member
          • May 2008
          • 913

          Originally posted by BHP FAN
          isn't it just ''parts'' unless it's assembled?It cant be fired when its stowed in it's stock, so why couldn't it be stowed under the seat of a jeep, or a canoe? How can it be a concealed weapon disassembled?
          Great question, just like having a 100% stripped receiver. Would that be a concealed fire arm if thats all you had?

          Comment

          • #6
            BHP FAN
            Member
            • Dec 2008
            • 419

            Seems to me it would be just the same. you can't fire it, even unstowed, there's no chamber, barrel, or grip, until it's assembled.

            Comment

            • #7
              GettoPhilosopher
              Senior Member
              • Sep 2010
              • 1814

              That's what I'm wondering about. I'd love to throw one (disassembled) in my backpack while hiking, or in the back seat if I were driving out in the boonies or something in that ballpark, and it *seems* like as it's not a functioning firearm unless/until assembled, it wouldn't need to be locked up.

              Then again, our gun laws aren't all that rational, and I don't want to be a test case over a .22.

              Comment

              • #8
                DippyPower
                Member
                • Sep 2007
                • 466

                The problem I see is with the magazine storage. I would definitely not keep a loaded magazine in the receiver when it is disassembled. I would also be leery of keeping the magazines loaded in the stock. I think there is case law about shells in a shell holder on a shotgun as not being a loaded shotgun, but I am not a lawyer so I have no idea how a court would react to loaded mags in the stock.
                Originally posted by Ironchef
                Small bands of ferocious animals would form and AK47's would be hoisted defiantly in the air with that all too heroic war-cry.....
                ARMADILLOS!!!
                ----------------------------------------------------
                "You see in this world there's two kinds of people, my friend. Those with loaded guns, and those who dig. You dig."
                - Blondie

                Comment

                • #9
                  BHP FAN
                  Member
                  • Dec 2008
                  • 419

                  Simple enough, don't load the mags, and keep the .22's in the glove box locked up in case of earthquake or other emergency.

                  Comment

                  Working...
                  UA-8071174-1