Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

New CCI minimags 1650fps=fun!

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Falstaff
    Senior Member
    • Mar 2010
    • 2317

    New CCI minimags 1650fps=fun!

    I just tried some new (well, new to me I havent seen them before) 36gr 1600+ fps .22lr's today. Wow, noticably louder, noticable increased recoil and smoke, but also noticably more fun in my MkIII hunter. Shot 100 rds. of them, I started mixing them in the mags with 1350fps winchester HP's and some bulk pack federal, HUGE difference. I was shooting some silouhettes<sic> and CCI's really banged 'em hard compared to the other ammo. It seemed to me, seat of the pants, that this ammo might be getting into centerfire pistol power range! Their kinda expensive compared to other .22's but I wont buy anything else now (5.00 a box of 50), Jus thought I'd mention it!
  • #2
    ojisan
    Agent 86
    CGN Contributor
    • Apr 2008
    • 11773

    Actually, those are called Stingers or SHP, not Mini-Mags.
    Yes, they are the "magnum loads" for the .22LR.
    Fun stuff!
    The Stinger case is every-so-slightly longer than a normal .22LR case to squeeze in a little more powder.
    Some .22LR chambers are a little too short or tight to safely use this ammo.
    Stingers in most modern guns like your Mk3 should be no problem, some manufacturers do warn against them and other "hyper-velocity" ammo, though.
    In older (actually any / all) guns, always check the first few rounds of Stingers fired for any signs of high / over pressure...sticky extraction, bulged case, split case at mouth.

    Originally posted by Citadelgrad87
    I don't really care, I just like to argue.

    Comment

    • #3
      professorhard
      Senior Member
      • Jun 2008
      • 2328

      They're also he** on squirrels.
      God, grant me the serenity
      To accept the things I cannot change;
      The courage to change the things I can;
      And the wisdom to know the difference.

      Comment

      • #4
        Falstaff
        Senior Member
        • Mar 2010
        • 2317

        Do you think they'll work ok in an old 10-22 (purchased in 1984)?

        Comment

        • #5
          Big Shrek
          Junior Member
          • Jul 2010
          • 76

          Yep. You'll need a new buffer & recoil spring as a backup tho...
          Stingers are a bit hot for the rifle and cause premature wear on the $5 part.
          But that's it. As long as you keep a pair of each on hand for backups, you'll be set.

          Anything built Pre-1968 will probably have issues with Stingers.
          Most rifles pre-1968 were made for Standard Velocity rounds...they often
          have issues with High Velo, definitely with Hyper-Velo Stingers/Yellowjackets.
          Marlin Specialist
          Calico Collector

          Comment

          • #6
            Falstaff
            Senior Member
            • Mar 2010
            • 2317

            Thanks, I'll get a new spring, but where's/what's the 'buffer' on a 10-22? Is it that dowel in the back end of the receiver?

            Comment

            • #7
              ojisan
              Agent 86
              CGN Contributor
              • Apr 2008
              • 11773

              Yes.
              Some people replace the steel cross pin with a nylon-type pin as a shock absorber or buffer.
              I just keep the recoil springs fresh myself.

              ( Good info / post from Big Shrek).

              Originally posted by Citadelgrad87
              I don't really care, I just like to argue.

              Comment

              • #8
                darkhelmet
                Junior Member
                • Nov 2009
                • 27

                i leave the googling up to you, but i think 1400 fps is the bottom range of "hyper-velocity". which is not recommended by ruger in the mk3.

                i shot one box of winchester supreme hypervelocity and my lci broke off.

                Comment

                • #9
                  mkfromnm
                  Junior Member
                  • Jul 2010
                  • 88

                  Originally posted by Falstaff
                  Do you think they'll work ok in an old 10-22 (purchased in 1984)?
                  I have used them in 10-22 a bunch. Mine is old, 1980? There is some real good 22 out there. Buy a bunch, you could use it to hunt actually.

                  Comment

                  • #10
                    frigginchi
                    Senior Member
                    • Mar 2007
                    • 1160

                    Same kinda speed less money

                    Comment

                    • #11
                      kf6tac
                      Senior Member
                      • Aug 2009
                      • 1779

                      Originally posted by frigginchi
                      Yeah, those Aguila rounds are pretty sweet. Put a bunch of them through a .22LR converted 1911. Nice kick for such a little package.


                      Statements I make on this forum should not be construed as giving legal advice or forming an attorney-client relationship.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      UA-8071174-1