Tweet
As mentioned in another thread, I have the opportunity to purchase a Winchester 1890 in 22 WRF. I have determined based on serial number that it was made in 1923. My question has to do with trying to determine if the barrel has been replaced or might be original. Any help from knowledgeable individuals - Trapp55 or others 
- would be appreciated.
The receiver and barrel both have circled WP proof marks, which if I understand correctly signify assembly having been done at the Winchester factory:
barrel proofs.jpg
I do not note any other proofs - like a circle P.
The barrel is marked as a mod 1890:
barrel label.jpg
My question has to do with do these go together as original? It is my understanding, based on other Internet info, that Winchester started marking the barrels as "mod 90" in 1919. If this is correct, would it be likely that the barrel from 4 years later would still be marked "mod 1890" or is it more likely that the rifle was sent back to the factory for re-barreling? If it is the later, would there be any other proof marking?
The only other relevant info is that the barrel appears in slightly better shape wear wise than the finish on the receiver - neither are bad but the barrel has less fine surface wear/scratches.
I appreciate anyone's help here.
- would be appreciated.The receiver and barrel both have circled WP proof marks, which if I understand correctly signify assembly having been done at the Winchester factory:
barrel proofs.jpg
I do not note any other proofs - like a circle P.
The barrel is marked as a mod 1890:
barrel label.jpg
My question has to do with do these go together as original? It is my understanding, based on other Internet info, that Winchester started marking the barrels as "mod 90" in 1919. If this is correct, would it be likely that the barrel from 4 years later would still be marked "mod 1890" or is it more likely that the rifle was sent back to the factory for re-barreling? If it is the later, would there be any other proof marking?
The only other relevant info is that the barrel appears in slightly better shape wear wise than the finish on the receiver - neither are bad but the barrel has less fine surface wear/scratches.
I appreciate anyone's help here.
Comment