Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

Stainless vs blued barrel, does heat dissipation matter?

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Relativist
    CGN/CGSSA Contributor
    • Feb 2013
    • 147

    Stainless vs blued barrel, does heat dissipation matter?

  • #2
    mjmagee67
    Veteran Member
    • Jun 2011
    • 2771

    I could be wrong but I don't see a .22 rimfire generating enough heat to matter. I've shot .22 a lot and don't recall the barrel getting that hot.
    If you want change you have to put in your 2 cents, you can't just sit on the sidelines and whine.

    Comment

    • #3
      kcheung2
      Veteran Member
      • Aug 2012
      • 4387

      Perhaps the Papoose barrel is different, but on the 60 & 795 the barrel is so thick that it takes forever to heat up. After 500 rounds it's still cooler than my car exterior on a hot summer day. I don't think heat dissipation is a problem regardless of material.
      ---------------------
      "There is no "best." If there was, everyone here would own that one, and no other." - DSB

      Comment

      • #4
        chomorro
        Senior Member
        • Jul 2017
        • 590

        I had a blued 10/22 factory barrel that definitely got hot after non stop shooting. Had to let it sit before putting it away.

        Sent from my SM-N950U using Tapatalk

        Comment

        • #5
          alpha_romeo_XV
          Veteran Member
          • Jun 2006
          • 3078

          How did you come to the understanding that blued steel dissapates heat better than stainless?
          Mass and surface area of the barrel surely more impact than the steel alloy.

          Comment

          • #6
            Half Cocked
            Senior Member
            • Dec 2007
            • 1856

            Originally posted by alpha_romeo_XV
            How did you come to the understanding that blued steel dissapates heat better than stainless?
            Mass and surface area of the barrel surely more impact than the steel alloy.
            The thermal conductivity of stainless steel is lower than that of carbon steel. Since we are talking about .22LR the barrel is not going to get hot enough to worry about.

            Comment

            • #7
              newbie1234
              Veteran Member
              • Feb 2016
              • 3130

              Originally posted by Relativist
              …..I’ve always liked the blued barrel because my understanding is they dissipate heat better.....
              I am not a mechanical engineer nor gun smith , but I don't think that is a true statement.

              BTW, what barrel will dissipate more heat , the Navy grey or the Army green (oops FDE now) ?
              Last edited by newbie1234; 09-28-2018, 2:02 AM.

              Comment

              • #8
                jstert
                Member
                • May 2016
                • 435

                i have both a blue barrel/wood stock and a stainless barrel/plastic stock papoose. i dont notice any difference in shooting and love them both. great, politically correct trunk and camp guns.


                Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

                Comment

                • #9
                  Tehjosheh
                  Senior Member
                  • Mar 2012
                  • 935

                  carbon steel usually has a higher thermal conductivity than stainless - though it all depends on the specific alloy used:


                  Higher thermal conductivity means the heat will distribute more evenly and have a more uniform temperature.


                  Another important property is coefficient of thermal expansion (CTE). CTE is generally higher on stainless steel which means it will expand more at a given temperature compared to carbon steel.
                  Linear thermal expansion coefficients of common materials, including metals, plastics, and composites.


                  Seems like carbon steel performs better thermally but my guess is its corrosion resistance, even when blued, is not as good. However, at the end of the day, the numbers may not result in noticeable differences using 22lr and depending on the distances/rate fired.

                  Comment

                  • #10
                    TKM
                    Onward through the fog!
                    CGN Contributor
                    • Jul 2002
                    • 10657

                    You won't live long enough to notice the difference.
                    It's not PTSD, it's nostalgia.

                    Comment

                    • #11
                      small hole shooter
                      Senior Member
                      • Mar 2013
                      • 1183

                      Interesting, this.

                      Comment

                      • #12
                        Tehjosheh
                        Senior Member
                        • Mar 2012
                        • 935

                        there is one other piece that is not considered; machineability.

                        my understanding is stainless steel is generally easier to machine than carbon steel.

                        this means, over 18" of barrel length (or however long), that 0.22X" barrel diameter can be held to much tighter tolerances using stainless as opposed to . carbon steel - resulting in a tighter group.

                        my guess is the tighter tolerances achieved thru stainless machining out perform the thermal drawbacks for 22lr.

                        now, fully automatic higher caliber - that sounds like a fun experiment/trade study!

                        Comment

                        • #13
                          Relativist
                          CGN/CGSSA Contributor
                          • Feb 2013
                          • 147

                          I'd expect that radiative heat transfer would be dominant. Radiative heat transfer depends on the emissivity.



                          Here's a table.

                          The radiation heat transfer emissivity coefficients for some common materials like aluminum, brass, glass and many more.




                          Luckily I have a FLIR camera for my iPhone, next time I'm at the range I'll take pictures.

                          Comment

                          • #14
                            Relativist
                            CGN/CGSSA Contributor
                            • Feb 2013
                            • 147

                            Originally posted by jstert
                            i have both a blue barrel/wood stock and a stainless barrel/plastic stock papoose. i dont notice any difference in shooting and love them both. great, politically correct trunk and camp guns.


                            Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
                            Thanks for the answer. I'm probably going to just buy new. Another thing that was holding me back is the lack of a forward handguard and place to mount a scout scope, but I found a keymod handguard, which solves both.

                            Since 2013, the leader in tactical lever actions. High-quality lever-action rifle parts for Henry, Marlin, Rossi, Smith & Wesson, Gforce, Winchester and more.

                            Comment

                            • #15
                              jstert
                              Member
                              • May 2016
                              • 435

                              Originally posted by Relativist
                              Thanks for the answer. I'm probably going to just buy new. Another thing that was holding me back is the lack of a forward handguard and place to mount a scout scope, but I found a keymod handguard, which solves both.



                              http://www.rangerpointstore.com/marl...mod-handguard/


                              wow, very interesting papoose mod, thanks for sharing.


                              Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              UA-8071174-1