For people who live in free State

[newbie1234]

Wish that I live in free State.

http://grabagun.com/rug-mkiii-22-45-22pst-5-5b-as.html

http://grabagun.com/mag-ruger-mkiii-22-45-22lr-10rd.html

[joe47]

Wish that I live in free State.

http://grabagun.com/rug-mkiii-22-45-22pst-5-5b-as.html

http://grabagun.com/mag-ruger-mkiii-...22lr-10rd.html

I bought several a while back for a Mark II. Great prices.

The state I live in is so free I can walk into a gun shop and walk out with any hand gun or long gun after filling out a 4473. No waiting period. I'm afraid someday soon that may change, if SHE gets elected.

[CalNRA]

It only fell off the list a few years ago too. I guess I get Ruger's reasoning of "we won't play ball" but it's a shame, Buckmark prices are higher than they look because the Rugers all came with an extra mag and a scope rail included.

[newbie1234]

It only fell off the list a few years ago too. I guess I get Ruger's reasoning of "we won't play ball" but it's a shame, Buckmark prices are higher than they look because the Rugers all came with an extra mag and a scope rail included.

Just hope that Ruger get back to the Roster. If you live in Kalifornia and you want to plink you have only one choice, the Buckmark. They can sell Buckmark with any (high) price they want to, because Buckmark is the only game in town.

[cnj]

Just hope that Ruger get back to the Roster. If you live in Kalifornia and you want to plink you have only one choice, the Buckmark. They can sell Buckmark with any (high) price they want to, because Buckmark is the only game in town.

Not going to happen. The Mark series fell off the roster, and to get back on, would require it to have microstamping capabilties, which don't exist in the real world.

[cnj]

Wish that I live in free State.

http://grabagun.com/rug-mkiii-22-45-22pst-5-5b-as.html

http://grabagun.com/mag-ruger-mkiii-...22lr-10rd.html

Great deal on the 22/45. I paid a bit more for mine when they were still on the roster. Glad I got it when I had the chance.

[WMG]

I picked up an extra one early this year for $269 , plus the 6 percent sales tax.
They are good guns but we do like the buck marks better.
After coming here I couldn't figure out at first why you folks were paying so much for these

[Stingray3]

Not going to happen. The Mark series fell off the roster, and to get back on, would require it to have microstamping capabilties, which don't exist in the real world.

^^^This!!!! And if things don't change, many more pistols will be falling off the roster.

[newbie1234]

^^^This!!!! And if things don't change, many more pistols will be falling off the roster.

Any slingshot get in the Roster lately

[Rosebud22]

That $5.99 for shipping is a deal breaker for me.
Damm crying shame. The ruger Mark xx has been
out since 1949. Now unsafe in Commiefornia.

[newbie1234]

That $5.99 for shipping is a deal breaker for me.
Damm crying shame. The ruger Mark xx has been
out since 1949. Now unsafe in Commiefornia.

I bought a Ruger Mark II 20 years ago, the one used by US government and Kalifornia claim it's unsafe .

http://s345.photobucket.com/user/datman1234/media/Public/IMG_0113_zpscp5euzt7.jpg.html

http://s345.photobucket.com/user/datman1234/media/Public/IMG_0115_zpsweldjev9.jpg.html

http://s345.photobucket.com/user/datman1234/media/Public/IMG_0114_zps2p4fottk.jpg.html