Tactical Innovations CH22

[SFCRangerDoc]

Anybody have any experience with these aftermarket 10/22 recievers? I'm reading good things about them but was hoping to get some real world data from the CG community. I'm looking to build up a 10/22 and while I could certainly buy a base model and swap everything out, What's the point really...

http://www.tacticalinc.com/matte-black-ch22%E2%84%A2-brbillet-rear-charging-handle-brreplacement-1022%C2%AE-receiver-br-available-with-match-bolt-p-5498.html?osCsid=0b1skndg9a0s6f5v7nj5r3im62

[RNE228]

I shoot AR and 10/22(and other rifle, pistol, shotgun).

Having shot many semi-auto's(AR, AK, SKS, Mini-14, various 22's) I have to say IMHO the AR charge handle is an odd duck design. I much prefer the side handle 10/22, Mini-14 etc.

Eugene Stoner designed some cool stuff. That charge handle is not one of them.

The 10/22 has its own little oddities like that cruddy designed bolt release. Now way I'd add a charge handle to one. IMHO, of course.

[Quiet]

Eugene Stoner designed some cool stuff. That charge handle is not one of them.

The T-shaped charging handle on the AR is not the original design.

The AR was originally designed with a top mounted charging handle.


The T-shaped charging handle came about due to US Army testing and requesting the top mounted charging handle be changed.

[PMACA_MFG]

video

Would think a left hand charge might be a better idea. or a red dot sight.