Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

Scope Problems/Canting Crosshairs?

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • josh250
    Member
    • Oct 2011
    • 424

    Scope Problems/Canting Crosshairs?

    Hello everyone. I just got back from the range today after attempting to zero my rifle scope. I had many problems but was able to get groups within 3inches at 100 yards(bad i know). This is my second attempt at zeroing a scope on a rifle. I think my mistake may have been anticipating recoil and pulling off target. I also wasn't able to get perfect eye relief and as a result my cheek weld was too far forward and I ended up getting a nice hard tap from the scope onto the top of my left brow about 5 times. Had it not been for my eye protection, i think i may have cut my brow.

    So I get home and want to check my eye relief. As I turn the scopes power down, i notice it feels odd. I look into the scope and my crosshairs are now canted. I check to see if the scope tube is loose, but everything is fine. The back of the scope (not sure of the name) is actually screwing off. I tighten it down as far to the right as possible, now its tight, but the cross hairs are totally canted.

    Any solution to my problem would be greatly appreciated. I'm totally new to rifle scopes and am learning as I go, so please excuse my lack of knowledge on the subject. The scope is a inexpensive Bushnell Trophy 73-3940 3-9x40 that was handed down to me.
    Last edited by josh250; 10-24-2013, 6:55 PM.
  • #2
    Merc1138
    I need a LIFE!!
    • Feb 2009
    • 19742

    No logo or indicator of manufacturer on the scope at all? Got a pic?

    If you're talking about the rear most part that you look through(ocular end), there is typically a focus ring specifically for focusing the reticle that you should use. Odds are there's a separate lock ring as well to screw down against it so it doesn't move as easily. This should have been explained in the manual it came with.

    How far canted are the crosshairs? Are we talking a couple of degrees or something wonky like a 45 degree tilt? Did you torque the rings to spec?

    Comment

    • #3
      brando
      Veteran Member
      • Feb 2006
      • 3694

      If your scope is coming apart, you've purchased a piece of crap.
      --Brando

      Comment

      • #4
        josh250
        Member
        • Oct 2011
        • 424

        Thanks Merc, for clarifying the ocular end for me. I also updated the post with the scope info.

        Yes the rings are nice and tight and the tube is not moving. The focus ring is not the object that i am referring to. Its actually the whole ocular end. The crosshairs can be moved beyond 45degrees, its pretty extreme. I think i can unscrew the ocular end off if i keep unscrewing.

        Comment

        • #5
          josh250
          Member
          • Oct 2011
          • 424

          Originally posted by brando
          If your scope is coming apart, you've purchased a piece of crap.
          I really hope your right, lol. I want know for a fact that its a piece of crap and purchase a new one, than have a decent, inexpensive, scope in my hands, then trash it because I don't know much about the scope.
          Last edited by josh250; 10-24-2013, 7:23 PM.

          Comment

          • #6
            brando
            Veteran Member
            • Feb 2006
            • 3694

            Here's a good rule of thumb about scope values:

            sub-$500 = crap, don't expect much. Save for .22LR plinking

            sub-$1000 = economical, probably lacking in durability and optical quality, but great for overall plinking (ie not risking your life)

            sub-$2000 = good value, average quality across the board with the occasional outlier (IOR optical quality or Bushnell tactical features)

            sub-$3000 = quality of features goes up, better optical quality, feature rich, more durable, solid overall (ie don't be afraid to mount to a magnum).

            That's a pretty loose breakdown based on my personal experience. Everyone has different budgets to work with and different needs in a scope, so your mileage may vary. FWIW, I ran a sub-$1000 on my 10/22, a sub-$2000 on my Mk12 clone, and sub-$3000 scopes on my bolt guns (with the occasional $3000+ scope because I can afford to be picky).
            --Brando

            Comment

            • #7
              josh250
              Member
              • Oct 2011
              • 424

              Originally posted by brando
              Here's a good rule of thumb about scope values:

              sub-$500 = crap, don't expect much. Save for .22LR plinking

              sub-$1000 = economical, probably lacking in durability and optical quality, but great for overall plinking (ie not risking your life)

              sub-$2000 = good value, average quality across the board with the occasional outlier (IOR optical quality or Bushnell tactical features)

              sub-$3000 = quality of features goes up, better optical quality, feature rich, more durable, solid overall (ie don't be afraid to mount to a magnum).

              That's a pretty loose breakdown based on my personal experience. Everyone has different budgets to work with and different needs in a scope, so your mileage may vary. FWIW, I ran a sub-$1000 on my 10/22, a sub-$2000 on my Mk12 clone, and sub-$3000 scopes on my bolt guns (with the occasional $3000+ scope because I can afford to be picky).
              Wow, thanks for that breakdown Brando.

              I've read you should spend more on your glass than you did on your rifle, and your breakdown seems to concur with that.

              Comment

              • #8
                brando
                Veteran Member
                • Feb 2006
                • 3694

                You should be willing to spend more on glass. It's sometimes not necessary and there are mitigating factors. It doesn't mean everything that's not S&B or Nightforce is crap nor that highend scopes are what everyone should be getting. Far from that. But having realistic expectations is important and unfortunately when you go cheap, it ends up costing you in the long run in most cases.
                --Brando

                Comment

                • #9
                  brando
                  Veteran Member
                  • Feb 2006
                  • 3694

                  Here's a good read for you....

                  --Brando

                  Comment

                  • #10
                    josh250
                    Member
                    • Oct 2011
                    • 424

                    Originally posted by brando
                    That was a very informative article. It was so informative I now have more questions than I did before, and that's always a good thing. I'm going to do some more digging around and research as much as possible. Thanks for the great reference.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    UA-8071174-1