Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

ATN vs. Aimshot; who's better quality?

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • kwest10
    Senior Member
    • Jun 2007
    • 606

    ATN vs. Aimshot; who's better quality?

    AND which of the 2 doesn't have the battery located on the bottom? I don't want to have to rezero after I change the battery.
    I know most of you will say buy an acog or eotech but let's face it, this scope will NEVER see combat conditions. That's what the rifle in the armory is for.
    I know they are both "cheap" but the rifle it will be on is just a plinker and MAYBE a 3 gunner. I only did one IPSC and one steel shoot last year. I was thinking of the ATN digital or AIMshot holosight. Both around 150. I don't like tube sights unless its a bench/prone long distance shooter.
    Thanks.
  • #2
    Teletiger7
    Veteran Member
    • Oct 2005
    • 2720

    For that price get a S.P.O.T. scope. Or for a little bit more you can buy a Bushnell holosight.
    Last edited by Teletiger7; 03-04-2008, 8:20 AM.

    Comment

    • #3
      Hoop
      Ready fo HILLARY!!
      • Apr 2007
      • 11534

      Bushnell makes a holosight that's basically an Eotech for 250 I think. If you want a holosight that's the lowest I'd go.

      And ATN is terrible, I'd never buy their stuff.

      Comment

      • #4
        kwest10
        Senior Member
        • Jun 2007
        • 606

        thought about the SPOT and the bushnell. SPOT is a tube and for me are annoying for rapid shooting. The bushell i "hear" has EO guts but the reason for looking at the ATN and AIM shot is it had the different tacticool reticle patterns.

        Comment

        Working...
        UA-8071174-1