Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

Weaver vs Picatinney

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • littlejake
    Senior Member
    • Aug 2008
    • 2168

    Weaver vs Picatinney

    I need a little help with the difference between a Weaver vs Picatinney rail/mount.

    From what I read, a Picatinney is a mil-spec version of a weaver with defined slot separation, width, and depth.

    Is it correct to say that a mount or scope designed for for a Weaver rail will always mount on a Picatinney rail?

    Is it correct to say that a mount or scope designed for a Picatinney might fit on a Weaver rail in some cases?
    Life Member NRA and 2A Foundation.
    My posts are my own opinions and do not reflect those of any organization I am a member of.
    Nothing I post should be construed as legal advice; if you need legal advice, see a lawyer.

    "Necessity is the plea for every infringement of human freedom. It is the argument of tyrants; it is the creed of slaves."
    William Pitt (1759-1806)
  • #2
    car15
    Member
    • Jan 2006
    • 494

    Weaver fits all my picatinny rails. My picatinny mount won't work on my factory ruger 10/22 tactical mount where as the weaver fit perfectly. I don't know if the raised center section on the ruger mount are on all weaver rails.

    Comment

    • #3
      OutlawDon
      Veteran Member
      • Dec 2006
      • 3138

      What are the differences between the “Picatinny” and the “Weaver” systems? The profile of the two systems is virtually identical. Depending on the quality of the machining done by the manufacturer, the two systems should be indistinguishable from the profile. The key difference lies in the placement of the recoil grooves and with width of the grooves. MIL-STD-1913 (Picatinny) grooves are .206” wide and have a center-to-center width of .394”. The placement of these grooves has to be consistent in order for it to be a true “Picatinny” MIL-STD system. Weaver systems have a .180” width of recoil groove and are not necessarily consistent in a center-to-center measurement from one groove to the next. In many instances, a Weaver system has a specific application that it is machined for, so interchangeability is not necessarily an issue. A MIL-STD-1913 system must adhere to the specifications listed above in order for it to be considered MIL-STD, since the military desires uniformity in the recoil grooves to allow for different systems to be mounted on the weapon with no concern for compatibility.

      Now, what does this mean to you? Boiled down, it means that accessories designed for a Weaver system will, in most cases, fit on a “Picatinny” system. The reverse, however, is probably not the case. Due to the larger recoil groove, “Picatinny” accessories will not fit a Weaver system. There are, of course, exceptions to every rule, but for a good rule-of-thumb, “Picatinny” won’t fit Weaver, but Weaver will fit “Picatinny”.

      If possible, it's best to fit a Picatinny to a Picatinny setup for the tightest fit. It's safe insurance so there are no weak chains in that system.
      Last edited by OutlawDon; 02-12-2012, 7:52 PM.

      Comment

      Working...
      UA-8071174-1