Any info on these? Are they on par with Eotech and Aimpoint? Which one is the preferred brand?
Unconfigured Ad Widget
Collapse
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bushnell red dot scopes
Collapse
X
-
I just ordered the Bushnell Trophy MP, it comes in sometime today. I will post some pics once it's in. The bushnell will work great for target/range and hunting. If i was going to Iraq i would take an ACOG or Aimpoint though. EOTech's are also very nice, just shorter battery life. -
From what i have read about Holosights i would stay away from them. Their battery life is horrible and they apparantley drain the battery while not even being turned on. This is just what i have read from the AR15 forums.
Here is a useful link for ya:
(Great 9 page thread there with lots of information)Comment
-
Got the pics up! Here are 4 links (they are big pics)
Comment
-
The HOLOSights are made using the EOTech patents and technology. They do not use the same high-end circuitry, nor are they as tough as a true EOTech. They're not much cheaper, either. Get the 512 EOTech. The Bushnell Riflescope HOLOSight is ok, too, but it's not as rugged and it's the N-cell version which eats batteries.
The Trophy MP is made to look like an ACOG. It's a lot of extra bulk for no optical benefit.
His irons are definitely not co-witnessed. It looks like he can not deploy the irons with the optic mounted like that.
If he were able to flip them up and use them through the optic, they would be considered co-witnessed.
Google Map of OLL Dealers
List of CA-friendly Manufacturers, Dealers, Middlemen, and Magazine rebuild kit dealers
Click me-->So you're a n00b and you want to build an AR? <--Click me
This post is based on actual events. Some facts may be altered for dramatic purposes. All posts are pure opinion. All persons, living and dead, are purely coincidental, and should not be construed.Comment
-
The HOLOSights are made using the EOTech patents and technology. They do not use the same high-end circuitry, nor are they as tough as a true EOTech. They're not much cheaper, either. Get the 512 EOTech. The Bushnell Riflescope HOLOSight is ok, too, but it's not as rugged and it's the N-cell version which eats batteries.
The Trophy MP is made to look like an ACOG. It's a lot of extra bulk for no optical benefit.
His irons are definitely not co-witnessed. It looks like he can not deploy the irons with the optic mounted like that.
If he were able to flip them up and use them through the optic, they would be considered co-witnessed.
/Agree
Do not waste your money on a Holosight when you can buy an EOTech for a little bit more. I had offers of EOTech's 512 (Rev. F) for $340 shipped/new or $300 used/shipped. It was a hard choice for me, but I went with the Bushnell because I wanted to buy that Magpul stock, rail grips, and the Pmgap 30/10 mag. For its price range the Bushnell MP Trophy is a great optic with a LIFETIME warranty. From what I read EOTech's only have a 3 year (take that with a grain of salt). Eventually I will purchase the EOTech 512 and put the Bushy on a secondary gun. Either way you cannot go wrong.
If I move the optic up a few notches on the rail I can co-witness, but I like it's current position and unless I move to the Middle East I feel pretty safe those paper targets are not going to be attacking me. Of course if I were to move to the Middle East I wouldn't even bring this rifle. I would take the issued gun and optics.Last edited by pbrand; 11-02-2007, 7:22 AM.Comment
-
Scroll down to the bottom of this link to check out a Bushy with a co-witness.
Comment
Calguns.net Statistics
Collapse
Topics: 1,866,815
Posts: 25,149,562
Members: 357,116
Active Members: 4,568
Welcome to our newest member, Dadmeep.
What's Going On
Collapse
There are currently 39368 users online. 36 members and 39332 guests.
Most users ever online was 239,041 at 10:39 PM on 02-14-2026.


Comment