Sirs/Madams,
Ok, so please let me start off by saying, I've used the search button, on this, and the other major forums visited by AR/acog enthusiasts. I've read many threads that discuss this very dilemma (most with problemchild always pushing for the ta11
), for almost 2 months now, but I still have these two optics neck and neck when it comes to my purpose and rifle.
My intent is to post what I've learned, hopefully get clarification and/or answers to questions I have not seen answers to. And hopefully, at the end (because I don't think I can make this decision on my own) have you guys decide for me with the poll attached to this thread (only somewhat joking about that, it could possibly come down to that).
The rifle this optic is for:
14.5 mid-length with fsb, its basically a noveske n4 skinny carbine with an omega9 and emod, here's a crap picture:

(not that it matters, but the vertical fore grip is probably coming off)
Here's what I've read as the pros/cons of the two optics
TA11
pros:
better eye relief which lends itself to other pros, being:
faster/easier to get your site picture
(I've also read that although this has slightly less magnification, the longer eye relief actually looks over the FSB on mid-lengths, where as you will see a faint shadow on the 4x acogs, can anyone confirm this?)
cons:
larger/heavier (2inches longer, 4oz heavier)
slightly less magnification
less FOV
TA31
pros:
slightly more magnification
more FOV
smaller/lighter
con:
eye relief, and all that entails (opposite consequences as listed above)
ill admit that the ta31 is sexier, but function has to win out over looks... again usable, practical.
How i intend to use this rifle/optic:
Since my only other AR is setup for highpower competition shooting, this is my 'practical' rifle. it will mostly be just used for range shooting, where i usually enjoy hitting steel out past 100yrds and some paper at 100yrs. i dont really subscribe to the whole 'SHTF' gun, as no one can really agree as to what type of shooting that is, although I'd like this rifle to fit that role as well. and by that i mean, be versatile, maybe not great at any one given distance, but usable at all distances (within reason).
id appreciate any additional information and/or other factors I've completely missed that may have helped you make your decision. id appreciate it if people refrain from simply throwing out one over the other without giving some personal experience or reasons for their choice.
(edit: not sure if it matters, but the reticle would be red chevron, ta31f vs ta11f)
thanks!
sean
Ok, so please let me start off by saying, I've used the search button, on this, and the other major forums visited by AR/acog enthusiasts. I've read many threads that discuss this very dilemma (most with problemchild always pushing for the ta11
), for almost 2 months now, but I still have these two optics neck and neck when it comes to my purpose and rifle.My intent is to post what I've learned, hopefully get clarification and/or answers to questions I have not seen answers to. And hopefully, at the end (because I don't think I can make this decision on my own) have you guys decide for me with the poll attached to this thread (only somewhat joking about that, it could possibly come down to that).
The rifle this optic is for:
14.5 mid-length with fsb, its basically a noveske n4 skinny carbine with an omega9 and emod, here's a crap picture:

(not that it matters, but the vertical fore grip is probably coming off)
Here's what I've read as the pros/cons of the two optics
TA11
pros:
better eye relief which lends itself to other pros, being:
faster/easier to get your site picture
(I've also read that although this has slightly less magnification, the longer eye relief actually looks over the FSB on mid-lengths, where as you will see a faint shadow on the 4x acogs, can anyone confirm this?)
cons:
larger/heavier (2inches longer, 4oz heavier)
slightly less magnification
less FOV
TA31
pros:
slightly more magnification
more FOV
smaller/lighter
con:
eye relief, and all that entails (opposite consequences as listed above)
ill admit that the ta31 is sexier, but function has to win out over looks... again usable, practical.
How i intend to use this rifle/optic:
Since my only other AR is setup for highpower competition shooting, this is my 'practical' rifle. it will mostly be just used for range shooting, where i usually enjoy hitting steel out past 100yrds and some paper at 100yrs. i dont really subscribe to the whole 'SHTF' gun, as no one can really agree as to what type of shooting that is, although I'd like this rifle to fit that role as well. and by that i mean, be versatile, maybe not great at any one given distance, but usable at all distances (within reason).
id appreciate any additional information and/or other factors I've completely missed that may have helped you make your decision. id appreciate it if people refrain from simply throwing out one over the other without giving some personal experience or reasons for their choice.
(edit: not sure if it matters, but the reticle would be red chevron, ta31f vs ta11f)
thanks!
sean

Comment