Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

Nikon Monarch: which one?

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Adrn
    Junior Member
    • Mar 2011
    • 5

    Nikon Monarch: which one?

    I just recently picked up a Rem 700 in .308 WIN. Now, I have the joy of purchasing a new scope to go with it. I have checked out the Nikon line and I want to go with the Monarch in either 4-16x42SF or 5-20x44SF. I would mainly be using this rifle for pig, deer, and occasional range shooting. Most hunting here in CA. The 5-20 has 1/8MOA while the 4-16 has 1/4MOA. Also, is the side focus extremely beneficial? Let me know.

    Thanks for any feedback.

    -Adrian
  • #2
    NapaCountyShooter
    Senior Member
    • Nov 2009
    • 2417

    Side focus isn't crucial. If you're primarily using it for hunting, get the one with a lower starting magnification. 3X or 4X maximum low end. You'll want that low end for the larger field of view for finding game before you zoom in on it. I like 1/4 moa adjustments better than 1/8 personally. Less clicks to get to where you're going.
    Jonah

    Comment

    • #3
      OpticsPlanet
      Vendor/Retailer
      • Apr 2009
      • 2129

      Adrian,

      I like a 4-16x42. Perfect for shots from 50 yards with the SF to over 600-700 if need be for target. I used that same Monarch, 4-16x42SF, on a shoot recently and was very impressed with it. Picking the 4-16 or the 5-20 may depend on how far you're looking to shoot. I woudl only go with teh 5-20 if i was looking to shoot 300-1000+ yards majority of the time. 4-16 is ideal for 100-700+ yards. I actually prefer a side focus. Easy to keep you eye behind the glass and adjust for the distance you need rather than move and adjust an AO. Comes down to preference though. 1/4 MOA is my go to for a good all around turret as well.

      Trevor B
      OpticsPlanet
      CalGunners: Take 5% off your order of $50 or more at OpticsPlanet by using coupon code CALGUNS! Some exclusions apply.

      OpticsPlanet
      http://www.opticsplanet.com
      Toll-Free (888) 504-7864
      Send us a private message if we can be of help!

      Comment

      • #4
        pdugan6
        Senior Member
        • Mar 2009
        • 1150

        ^^^^agreed. you will rarely be taking a shot on an animal over 300yd so 5-20 is just added weight. when hunting your magnification is usually on lowest power anyways, as to acquire the target easier and you are rarely at full magnification.

        Comment

        • #5
          Adrn
          Junior Member
          • Mar 2011
          • 5

          Thank you all for the detailed responses. I am really starting to like this site and the members.

          Comment

          • #6
            bruce_ventura
            Vendor/Retailer
            • Jul 2006
            • 516

            Let me repeat what Napa said. Think lower magnification. Big game hunting in California is hilly and brushy. Short range shots (<150 yds) are common. Pigs can be dangerous. Fast target acquisition lowers your risk Seriously think as low as 1.5-6X, no more than 3-9X. IMHO 4-16X is too much magnification.
            NRA Life Member
            "The best we can hope for concerning the people at large is that they be properly armed." - Alexander Hamilton

            Comment

            Working...
            UA-8071174-1