Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

Bushnell Elite Series

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • evollep3
    Veteran Member
    • Sep 2008
    • 3074

    Bushnell Elite Series

    What are the major benefits between the Bushnell Elite Series first hand report wise 3200 vs 4200 vs 6500? better?
  • #2
    r08ert209cali
    Senior Member
    • Jan 2008
    • 1534

    I have a 3200, 3X9X40 and it was not acceptable on my deer rifle, just not bright enough or clear enough for the Grey Forrest when hunting. It works phenomenal on my 10/22T. Replaced it with a Nikon Buckmaster 4-14X40 Milldot which I highly recommend for the money is very nice.

    P.S. the rain cote sucks in the field when it is raining dosent really help much.

    I dunno, I've never been much for guns. I mean, sure, we have the usual gun by the door, another near the TV, one in the kitchen, and another in the bedroom...and several others laying around. For the most part though, we keep our home free of guns. We are peace loving folks.

    Comment

    • #3
      glockman19
      Banned
      • Jun 2007
      • 10486

      I have both the 3200 & 4200 series scopes. I prefer the 4200 to the 3200.

      Comment

      • #4
        evollep3
        Veteran Member
        • Sep 2008
        • 3074

        Originally posted by glockman19
        I have both the 3200 & 4200 series scopes. I prefer the 4200 to the 3200.
        is there a reason why? and btw i thought about the nikon buckmaster as well as the monarch

        Comment

        • #5
          Clodbuster
          Senior Member
          • Oct 2005
          • 1103

          4200 definitely has much better glass than the 3200. Can't tell the difference in glass quality between the 6500/4200 at 200yds.
          6500 if you want a 30mm tube, slightly wider adjustment range and higher magnification on most of the models.

          I prefer the 4200 over the 6500 because of 426242P model that Bushnell offers. And until Burris offers posi-align rings in 30mm, I'm happy with 1 inch tubes.


          Clod

          Originally posted by evollep3
          What are the major benefits between the Bushnell Elite Series first hand report wise 3200 vs 4200 vs 6500? better?

          Comment

          • #6
            evollep3
            Veteran Member
            • Sep 2008
            • 3074

            how about the knobs which one comes with the tall one?

            Comment

            • #7
              BamBam-31
              CGN/CGSSA Contributor
              • Dec 2005
              • 5318

              In my experience, the 4200 series is brighter than the 3200. Am looking to replace the 3200 on my .30-06 w/ a 4200....
              sigpic

              Comment

              • #8
                Jon Se
                Member
                • Sep 2008
                • 269

                And from what I can tell from browsing opticstalk it seems like the 4200 and 6500 use the same glass - though I have no concrete evidence. I own the 6500 4.5-30 and it's a great scope. The glass compares well to my friend's mk4 and the overall finish of the scope tube and turrets is impeccable. The scope has not lost zero after ~500 rounds of .308 and after being turned to both ends of the adjustment range. The turret clicks are solid and quiet, without much play in between clicks.

                My only complaints are that the scope gets noticeably dimmer at 25-30x magnification, though I don't know how this compares to other scopes, and the limited 50 moa elevation adjustment.

                Comment

                • #9
                  woodsman
                  Senior Member
                  • Jun 2009
                  • 569

                  I own a 4200 8-32. Have it on my AR varmit. No complaints. Very bright and hold ZERO.
                  "The Right Of The People To
                  Keep And Bear Arms Shall Not Be Infringed"

                  Nuff Said....!

                  Comment

                  • #10
                    capitol
                    Veteran Member
                    • Oct 2005
                    • 2503

                    the 4200's are a great value. they are nice scopes for the money paid.

                    the 6500's are good, but not great. they get a bit fuzzy when at full power. the large bells take in tons of light.

                    either of these scopes are a purchase you wont regret.

                    oh and the resale value is solid just in case your not happy

                    6500 on my R-25 243
                    Last edited by capitol; 09-27-2009, 8:12 PM.

                    Comment

                    • #11
                      LibertyOptics
                      Senior Member
                      • Mar 2008
                      • 592

                      I believe the glass in the 4200 is better than in the 6500. Not only from looking through them but from Bushnell's own copy.

                      I have a new 4.5-30x50 here, new in the box, I'll make someone a screaming deal on. It's got capped turrets.

                      Scott
                      Liberty Optics LLC
                      "See Better, Shoot Better"
                      www.LibertyOptics.com
                      Scott@LibertyOptics.com
                      406-827-6543
                      Scott's cell number: 406-291-8250

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      UA-8071174-1