Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

Optic for JM Marlin 1894 "trapper" limited.

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • JagerDog
    I need a LIFE!!
    • May 2011
    • 14449

    Optic for JM Marlin 1894 "trapper" limited.

    I have a 45 Colt in above. Currently has a Leupold 1-4 w/ hogplex reticle with Warne QR rings and Weaver base.

    I actually have a small collection of JM Marlins. I can't see open sights anymore so all are wearing glass. I've tried to keep with the theme of Marlin/Leupold keeping them all USA.

    Well..I recently added anther 45 Colt. This time with a 20" round barrel. I've been considering moving the Hogplex to the 20" and putting a reflex optic on the "Trapper". I can continue with Leupold albeit more $ than say Vortex or Burris. I do rather like the motion sensor concept. I'd like to keep it low profile an connect to either the Weaver or a rail is an option. I do have extra Warne bases for Weaver style rings as I wasn't fond of the scope positioning, hence changed to Weaver bases.

    So anyone with experience with reflex red dot on a carbine? How about with poor near vision? Compelling reasons to divert from Leupold theme? Other USA considerations?

    Another thought is to move the 2-7x33 w/ SABR reticle from the 45-70 (1895) to the new Colt and go with a 3-9x40 (either SABR or CDS dial) on the 45-70
    Last edited by JagerDog; 01-18-2022, 7:04 PM.
    Palestine is a fake country

    No Mas Hamas



    #Blackolivesmatter
  • #2
    JagerDog
    I need a LIFE!!
    • May 2011
    • 14449

    Well, I found a good deal on a Vortex Venom 3 MOA reflex.

    Gonna take the 1-4 Leupold hogplex off the trapper and put it on the 20" carbine and put the Venom on the trapper and see how I like that.
    Palestine is a fake country

    No Mas Hamas



    #Blackolivesmatter

    Comment

    • #3
      MyOdessa
      CGN/CGSSA Contributor - Lifetime
      CGN Contributor - Lifetime
      • Mar 2011
      • 2311

      For what it worth, I am in your situation vision wise, and I also have Leupold 1-4x with PigPlex scopes on my Ruger PCC, Henry .41 Magnum and Marlin .41 Magnum rifles, because this scope just works really well over distances I will likely shoot these rifles.
      As far as red dot sights, I have them on my handguns, but I am not likely to shoot any of them past 25-35 yards. At 75-150 yards, I need scopes.

      Comment

      • #4
        JagerDog
        I need a LIFE!!
        • May 2011
        • 14449

        Originally posted by MyOdessa
        For what it worth, I am in your situation vision wise, and I also have Leupold 1-4x with PigPlex scopes on my Ruger PCC, Henry .41 Magnum and Marlin .41 Magnum rifles, because this scope just works really well over distances I will likely shoot these rifles.
        As far as red dot sights, I have them on my handguns, but I am not likely to shoot any of them past 25-35 yards. At 75-150 yards, I need scopes.
        Is the PCC in 40 so you can use the same bullets? I've been on the lookout off/on for one.

        Ya, bit of an experiment. I have a couple tubed red dots (pistol, AR pistol and Circuit Judge), one of them magnified, but no reflex. I doubt I'll be shooting the trapper beyond 100, so we'll see.
        Palestine is a fake country

        No Mas Hamas



        #Blackolivesmatter

        Comment

        • #5
          MyOdessa
          CGN/CGSSA Contributor - Lifetime
          CGN Contributor - Lifetime
          • Mar 2011
          • 2311

          Originally posted by JagerDog
          Is the PCC in 40 so you can use the same bullets? I've been on the lookout off/on for one.

          Ya, bit of an experiment. I have a couple tubed red dots (pistol, AR pistol and Circuit Judge), one of them magnified, but no reflex. I doubt I'll be shooting the trapper beyond 100, so we'll see.
          My PCC is in 9mm.

          Comment

          Working...
          UA-8071174-1