Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

Athlon Optics Midas TAC 6-24x50 First Focal Plane Riflescope

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Tommy Gun
    Senior Member
    • Apr 2011
    • 806

    Athlon Optics Midas TAC 6-24x50 First Focal Plane Riflescope

    Decided to take off the Sig BDX off the MP10 (replaced once because the glass literally dislodged inside the scope, firmware issues, pairing issues, etc.) and put my Vortex HSLR on it AMD grab some new glass for the Chassied Tikka T3. Finding Viper with reticle I wanted was getting hard to find and after some research decided on the above scope. Reticle is exactly what I wanted (XMas Tree with micro dot as center) and reputable turrets.

    Anyone have first hand expierence with this and are all the good praises I have seen for this scope for real? I got it on OP for $630 (1k "retail").
  • #2
    ZombieLivesMatter
    Veteran Member
    • Feb 2016
    • 2533

    Sounds like you had a lot of issues with the Sig, I remember a year or two back you were excited pairing it up with the Rangefinder.
    Originally posted by gwgn02
    G-shock, a good way to tell the time, and better way to tell the female variety you are unworthy mating material.

    Comment

    • #3
      DrewTheBrave
      Senior Member
      • Jun 2011
      • 1472

      I have an Ares BTR 2.5-15x50, which supposedly has very similar (if not the same) glass as the Midas Tac series. I'm really impressed with the optic, and the Midas should suit your needs well. I think Athlon has really done a fantastic job at designing optics tailored to mainstream price points with great features (great glass, excellent reticles, and reliable turrets). It compares nicely to my SWFA SS 3-15x42 (excellent tracking, but dated reticle) and Leupold VX-R Patrol 3-9x40 (annoyingly thick reticle, but excellent FireDot illumination). For what it's worth, the SWFA is on my 6.5 Grendel AR, the VX-R Patrol is on my 5.56 Mock12, and the Ares BTR is on my 6.5 Creedmoor Aero M5. I have a lot of confidence in the capabilities of the Athlon scopes, and hope to try an ETR or Cronus at some point.
      WTB: Beretta 92/M9 series (non-railed), Remington 1100 LT-20,

      Comment

      • #4
        Tommy Gun
        Senior Member
        • Apr 2011
        • 806

        Zombie: ya I mainly only used the fixed dot reticle points because after updating firmware and got it to track like twice with the rangefinder. I'll keep it for some other build i might do later.

        Comment

        • #5
          Peahi2
          Senior Member
          • Jan 2018
          • 817

          LUV the Midas tac....I do sometimes wish I had a illuminated reticle. I would pay more for it with the exact same scope...sorry, I don't know the name of scope in their line that would have those features

          Comment

          • #6
            static2126
            Calguns Addict
            • Mar 2013
            • 5618

            Originally posted by DrewTheBrave
            I have an Ares BTR 2.5-15x50, which supposedly has very similar (if not the same) glass as the Midas Tac series. I'm really impressed with the optic, and the Midas should suit your needs well. I think Athlon has really done a fantastic job at designing optics tailored to mainstream price points with great features (great glass, excellent reticles, and reliable turrets). It compares nicely to my SWFA SS 3-15x42 (excellent tracking, but dated reticle) and Leupold VX-R Patrol 3-9x40 (annoyingly thick reticle, but excellent FireDot illumination). For what it's worth, the SWFA is on my 6.5 Grendel AR, the VX-R Patrol is on my 5.56 Mock12, and the Ares BTR is on my 6.5 Creedmoor Aero M5. I have a lot of confidence in the capabilities of the Athlon scopes, and hope to try an ETR or Cronus at some point.
            I love the Leopold scope for an ar. Have a few 1.5 x 4 on ars. Great lightweight and rugged scope good out to 400 or so yards (further with better eyes)

            Comment

            Working...
            UA-8071174-1