I currently own a Leupold VX-II 3-9x40. It's mounted on my Rem700 .308 I love this scope. Now that I have a 20" A4 Varmint upper ordered, I'm looking at getting another Leupold. This would primarily be for bench-shooting (maybe the occasional varmint).
I'm trying to justify whether or not to spend an extra dough on a
VX-III 6.5-20x40 over another VX-II 6-18x40.
Is that extra 2x magnification worth another $100. is light transmission better through the vx-III?
I'm trying to justify whether or not to spend an extra dough on a
VX-III 6.5-20x40 over another VX-II 6-18x40.
Is that extra 2x magnification worth another $100. is light transmission better through the vx-III?

Comment