My beef with primary arms.

[bubbapug1]

My beef with primary arms is I have now bought two scopes for use in service rifle class. Neither is really super great. Ones a millet dms and the other is a Nikon 223.

Neither reticle is what I would call xtc friendly.

I'm holding my breath praying dimitri will fill this space with a nice scope, but alas it hasn't happened.

Come on brother, help us high power Xtc shooters out.

[Cypriss32]

Nightforce came out with a specific scope for your needs.

[radicalray]

Not sure why it's Primary's fault, I would of picked a different one, unless I'm missing something

[FMJBT]

Nightforce came out with a specific scope for your needs.

Yeah, but with a price tag of $1950.....

[JMP]

I am sure Dimitri had his hands full with the ACSS reticle and others. If these reticles don't provide to be superior choices, I am sure he'll be on it quickly.

[ExtremeX]

What other options are available?

What type of specific requirements do you need for xtc?

[ScottsBad]

Blaming Primary Arms is odd to say the least.

[bubbapug1]

It's sarcasm!!!

I'm begging here fellas!! Primary arms is a very progressive optics maker. If you haven't used the acss reticle I highly recommend it.

That said the world would be a better place if PA made a scope for XTC now that CMP allows optics on service rights.

I'll buy one.

[bubbapug1]

Cmp allows a 1 X 4.5. A good scope would have target turrets with 1/4 Moa adjustments. Parralax would be great but probably add a big price tag!! A single illuminated dot with perhaps a horse shoe reticle, just slightly larger than the black, would be excellent. I tried the acss reticle on a target. It's almost there but the magnification is too high (1x6) hence not allowed. The illumination on the PA unit allowed me to see the dot in the black and the horseshoe provides one more verification the sight is aligned properly.

If parralax is too expensive maybe set it for 200 yards as 40 of the 80 shots is taken at the 200 yard line.