Cheap scope versus expensive scope

[peekay331]

This is a newbie question, but what exactly is the difference between a cheap scope and expensive scope.

I have a Centerpoint from Walmart that cost about 70 bucks. It works fine on my Savage .22 bolt action. It holds zero and the cross hairs look fine.

Would I benefit anything from going to a nicer scope? I can't imagine how it would be any different. Or is that only necessary if I shot something with more recoil?

[Timberland]

On a 22, as long as it has good eye relief and is clear enough to see .22 holes your fine.

[maxicon]

There are lots of improvements as you spend more on scopes, and whether they make a difference to you depends on your needs and wants.

More money gets you all these things, in varying amounts:

- Better optics give more clarity, better light transmission, better edge clarity, better color rendition, etc.

- Solid build gives longer life, better reliability, more precise and repeatable adjustments, sturdiness, etc.

- Better brands have better resale and hold their value better.

Beyond that, there are more options for better scopes - more reticle choices, factory upgrades, etc.

Not all of that matters to everyone. I have lots of inexpensive but not cheap scopes, a few cheap scopes, and a few expensive scopes. They all have their places, even the Tascos that came on used .22 rifles.

[dodgerfan175]

It might not make much of a difference when mounted on a .22 and your just out shooting at ground squirrels or jack rabbits. But when you spot that buck of a lifetime and you go to put the cross-hairs on him and find your scope all fogged up because of moisture leaks, then you'll wish you had spent the extra money.