Not looking to shoot at 200-300 yards. Just want to see what I hit at like 100 yards. My eyes are old and tired. Found a few on Amazon , but was just looking to see what you guys started with before you made the big plunge. Thanks
Unconfigured Ad Widget
Collapse
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Best spotting scope under 100 bucks
Collapse
X
-
Best spotting scope under 100 bucks
Originally posted by SkyHawkWe're trying to exercise a constitutional right and stay out of jail doing it. Cheers to those who help us, jeers to those who stand in our way - you're literally no better than DeLeon or Pelosi. If you catch a bad wrap for making this harder than it has to be, I have no sympathy if you end up on the boycott list.
.Tags: None -
I started with a Barska 20-60x60... and when I made the "big plunge" we ponied up about $400-500 on our next scope which was made by Aplen.
There are some obvious quality differences if you are willing to spend $300+, but for 100 yard use, anything inexpensive will work fine.
All the lower end scopes will suffer as your turn up the magnification, but at 20x, its usable within reason. For zero work at 200-300, the use of shoot-n-c targets help a lot.ExtremeXComment
-
I know there are some 50-80 dollar ones out there. I was looking at a bushnell for 120. And barska is in that range as well. Just looking for a little input thanks xtreme x might go with the barska.Originally posted by SkyHawkWe're trying to exercise a constitutional right and stay out of jail doing it. Cheers to those who help us, jeers to those who stand in our way - you're literally no better than DeLeon or Pelosi. If you catch a bad wrap for making this harder than it has to be, I have no sympathy if you end up on the boycott list.
.Comment
-
What were your biggest complaints about the Barska 20-60?I started with a Barska 20-60x60... and when I made the "big plunge" we ponied up about $400-500 on our next scope which was made by Aplen.
There are some obvious quality differences if you are willing to spend $300+, but for 100 yard use, anything inexpensive will work fine.
All the lower end scopes will suffer as your turn up the magnification, but at 20x, its usable within reason. For zero work at 200-300, the use of shoot-n-c targets help a lot.Comment
-
Learn from my mistakes, there isnt a "best"one. Only unusable or worse than unusableComment
-
For that budget take a paper towel tube and use the bottom of a soda/beer bottle for lenses. Use black electrical tape to mount them to get lees interference than duct tape. Duct tape it to 3 sticks for a tripod.
Just use a quality scope(it will cost more than $100) and you will be able to see the target better for shooting and see your results. This is if using it for target shooting.
If wanting it for hunting get some quality(read cost more than $100) binos.A 30cal will reach out and touch them. A 50cal will kick their butt.
NRA Life Member, NRA certified RSO & Basic Pistol Instructor, Hunter, shooter, reloader
SCI, Manteca Sportsmen Club, Coalinga Rifle Club, Escalon Sportsmans Club, Waterford Sportsman Club & NAHA Member, Madison Society memberComment
-
At 29 Palms I tried the Leopold from the Marines . . . .
"There isnt a "best"one - only unusable or worse than unusable"
So yes there is a lot differenceWTB : Bren Ten - WTB : Wildey 45 & 475 MagnumComment
-
My biggest complaint is that its very limited in its actual usefulness... I originally bought it just to zero a rifle at 50/100 yards or spot check a target when I was not using magnified optics... for that, it filled the roll I bought it for.
As I got more serious about shooting, specifically anything long range, spotting shots, resolving detail at higher mags, overall comfort... it starts to fall short in a lot of different ways.
Looking though it for any extended period of time causes some eye fatigue.
Its very tight on eye relief, if you wear glasses, its amplified.
Optical performance beyond 20x is pretty bad, all it does is zoom in on the blur with reduced FOV.
It cant resolve much detail, resolving hits on steel or paper is difficult at distance. Zero at 200 or 300 yards the use of a shoot-n-c target is pretty much mandatory.
Its not a difficult optic to grow out of, but it just depends on what you want to do with it.
I would say its safe to assume all similarly priced optics would be similar in overall performance. No free lunch in optics.Last edited by ExtremeX; 04-23-2016, 9:46 PM.ExtremeXComment
-
thanks to everyone who gave real advice. kind of have an idea where to look and what specs to look for. extremex gave some useful advice , that I should have been more specific on what I was needing when asking for help on the site. just wanted to zero scopes to 100 yards and look to see placement when shooting with iron sights. so I appreciate all the help and the PM,s
joeOriginally posted by SkyHawkWe're trying to exercise a constitutional right and stay out of jail doing it. Cheers to those who help us, jeers to those who stand in our way - you're literally no better than DeLeon or Pelosi. If you catch a bad wrap for making this harder than it has to be, I have no sympathy if you end up on the boycott list.
.Comment
-
Cheap spotting scopes are pretty much junk unless you just want to see large blurry images of stuff that far away. You can't see details or sharp edges well which is what you need for zeroing rifles.
If you just want to watch the steel swing when you're buddy hits it at distance you might be ok.Comment
Calguns.net Statistics
Collapse
Topics: 1,864,233
Posts: 25,116,873
Members: 355,945
Active Members: 4,580
Welcome to our newest member, glocksource.
What's Going On
Collapse
There are currently 6555 users online. 135 members and 6420 guests.
Most users ever online was 239,041 at 10:39 PM on 02-14-2026.

Comment