Tweet
Anyone tried one? 1x or 3x?
-
-
Effectively the same as the Primary Arms and Burris counterparts .
I feel the Primary Arms reticle is superior.Last edited by MrPlink; 06-12-2015, 8:10 PM.The California Moderate Centrist Militia member in exile
disclaimer:
everything I post is for arguendo and entertainment purposes only, and should not be construed to be legal advice -
founterparks????Comment
-
I'm guessing that is autocorrect for 'counterparts'.sigpic NRA Benefactor Life Member / CRPA Life Member / SAF Life Member
Calguns.net an incorported entity - President.
The Calguns Shooting Sports Assoc. - Vice President.
The California Rifle & Pistol Assoc. - Director.
DONATE TO NRA-ILA, CGSSA, AND CRPAF NOW!
Opinions posted in this account are my own and unless specifically stated as such are not the approved position of Calguns.net, CGSSA or CRPA.Comment
-
Yep. And that's why you're the boss.
Though I'm not sure what founterparks are..
I should add that these are very impressive for the price.
Sure, the clarity is not even close to a trijicon, but given that we aren't talking about a high magnification precision optic the clarity is more than sufficient. Based on various tests by reviewers on the net they appear to be rather rugged as well, which given that we are talking about a fixed power prismatic optic is not surprising, as they are relatively simple.
I picked up a primary arms 4x a little while ago to toss on an AR15 budget build. I've been so impressed I'm going to run it on my Scar 17 for a laugh (# tacticheap).The California Moderate Centrist Militia member in exile
disclaimer:
everything I post is for arguendo and entertainment purposes only, and should not be construed to be legal adviceComment
There are currently 3874 users online. 112 members and 3762 guests.
Most users ever online was 239,041 at 10:39 PM on 02-14-2026.
Comment